Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: riverrunner
Guns are legal in the NF to bad more people don't carry

Per 36CFR2.4, you must have the firearm unloaded, cased and inaccessible while on NPS property.

A lot of good it would have done in this case.

19 posted on 04/14/2006 5:31:51 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Puppage

National Forest is part of the Forest Service, not the National Park System. Controlled by the USDA I beleive. Their conditions for carry track along with state CCW laws in most instances. National Parks, forget it.


25 posted on 04/14/2006 5:50:32 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Puppage
Per 36CFR2.4, you must have the firearm unloaded, cased and inaccessible while on NPS property.

A lot of good it would have done in this case.

I think a lot of people get confused about the difference between a National Forest and National Park. The incident in this story took place in a National Forest where it is perfectly legal to carry a loaded handgun. In a National Park however, you weapon must be unloaded and disassembled.

68 posted on 04/14/2006 7:05:52 AM PDT by Inyo-Mono (Life is like a cow pasture, it's hard to get through without stepping in some mess. NRA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Puppage

Yes on National park service property but this is national forest. Even on some National park property it is legal to process firearms. All the wild rivers under the wild river act is one of them.


124 posted on 04/14/2006 4:23:09 PM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson