[John 6.66=Mark of the Beast?]

I really don't care what a man has classified man as. You want to use the argument of what predates Darwinism and say it is valid. My source predates that.

[Dimensio]

I really don't care what a man has classified man as.

The classification is based upon observed physical traits of human organisms as compared to primates. It is an accurate classification as far as the criteria go. It appears that the only basis for your rejection of the classification is that you are uncomfortable with it. This, however, does not invalidate the classification based upon the criteria used.

You want to use the argument of what predates Darwinism and say it is valid. My source predates that.

The age or novelty of the source does not affect the truth value. I merely mentioned the age of the source to demonstrate that the classification does not, as you suggested, derive from the theory of evolution.