Skip to comments.
Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design
The Royal Society ^
| 11 Apr 2006
| Staff (press release)
Posted on 04/13/2006 6:51:19 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 381-400 next last
To: Right Wing Professor
Oh, perhaps I did not take his prophecy about me in the right spirit...I would love a vacation in Italy, especially Sicily, where my husbands family is from...
But no, this poster thought a return to 'Mother Europe', was indeed, a horrible, horrible thing...
To: Thatcherite
For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority.
Colossians 2:9-10
Retreat to Scripture quote as a substitute for argument placemarker.
Really, really, signing out for tonight now placemarker.
183
posted on
04/14/2006 1:32:02 PM PDT
by
Thatcherite
(Miraculous explanations are just spasmodic omphalism)
To: Echo Talon
How old is the earth?...most people who actually study these things, estimate about 4.5 billion years old...
Oh, ok, I know you will disagree...go ahead then...
To: Echo Talon
No, the same
My apologies. It appeared to me that you were suggesting that St. Augustine's statements should not be considered authoritative because he was merely a "man", yet should the same standard be applied to you it would mean that your words are also without authority. I was therefore assuming that you meant that you were more than a man. Clearly, however, you simply do not believe that anything that you say has any weight. I apologize for the confusion.
185
posted on
04/14/2006 1:32:36 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Thatcherite
Yoda: Worship man, you must not... :)
To: Right Wing Professor
Gee. How can I weather such a stinging rebuke from one who in this case rejects the authority of St. Augustine even when properly translated and understood?
To: hosepipe
No. Religion is an assumption (the assumption that there's a God running the show). Science is at least verifiable. Any assumptions are going to be smoothed over. Any individual piece of evidence might be interpreted any number of ways; the totality of the evidence, though, will yield very limited explanations.
188
posted on
04/14/2006 1:34:26 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: Thatcherite
Have a nice rest..your help on these threads is appreciated by me, and I am sure, by many of the lurkers...
To: Echo Talon
But . . . but . . . but . . . that's just your opinion.
To: Fester Chugabrew
How can I weather such a stinging rebuke from one who in this case rejects the authority of St. Augustine even when properly translated and understood?I wouldn't worry about weathering it. Just be happy you understood it.
To: Fester Chugabrew
Are you suggesting that your inaccurate translation of a quote from St. Augustine is a valid argument?
192
posted on
04/14/2006 1:36:04 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: andysandmikesmom
When called on his accuracy of these prophecies, he quickly did try to retreat, and actually stated that he regreted saying such a thing, but keep in mind, he insisted it was true... Would have been a real treat to actually meet a prophet, on the Internet no less. :)
To: andysandmikesmom
I have never been taught ID(I don't know that they teach), I believe in the Bible.
To: Echo Talon
And a prophet, who said he was 'always' correct in his predictions...I suppose he kept himself happy, thinking that I was worried about some sort of return to 'Mother Europe'(still cannot figure out what he meant by that)..
Internet prophets...whats next, I wonder...
To: Thatcherite
Retreat to Scripture quote as a substitute for argument placemarker. Because the scripture blew your St. argument out of the water?
Or was it the Yoda that did it? :)
To: VadeRetro
"Creationism is a belief that may be taught as part of religious education in schools, colleges and universities. Creationism may also be taught in some science classes to demonstrate the difference between theories, such as evolution, that are based on scientific evidence, and beliefs, such as creationism, that are based on faith."
Splendid. Now pass the sherry and shut up about this. Science boffins keep on workin'', Holy Rollers keep on rollin', and for God's sake have a drink together once in a while to compare notes.
197
posted on
04/14/2006 1:40:36 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunk
(Any legal immigrant who wants to join me as an American, is welcome.)
To: andysandmikesmom
How old is the earth?...most people who actually study these things, estimate about 4.5 billion years old... How do you square that with Genesis?
To: Dimensio
It wasn't my translation. My argument is that Augustine, like anyone else who makes public pronouncements, is not to be held in the same regard as biblical texts. If one cares to set forth Augustine as an authority on a given subject, most likely he will have to pick and choose. Obviously the text I chose, whether translated properly or not, is one from which the typical evolutionist would flee. Or do you consider his words regarding "a pact of friendship with demons" to reflect objective reality?
To: Dimensio
He was a man and I don't put my faith in man, you're better served putting it in the Lord.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 381-400 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson