Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: demkicker
Gee, I would think military protocol or at the very least, their duty as patriots would keep any retired general from publically speaking out against their commander in chief's decision making during a time of war.

The duty of a patriot is to speak out when you believe something is wrong. Agree or disagree, these men are expressing their sincere beliefs on the way the war is going. They have earned the right to do so, and they speak from experiences that the rest of us cannot begin to understand.

87 posted on 04/14/2006 4:16:18 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Well, it's backfiring on them because Bush will never be cornered and strong armed into firing Rumsfeld. Everyone knows how important loyalty is to Bush. He doesn't think too kindly of public backstabbing.

If those retired generals are really so troubled about the way Rumsfeld is running the war, they should get together and ask for a private meeting with the president to discuss their outrage and/or particular concerns. I'll concede they have earned the right to express their displeasure, but they chose a most unbecoming, unprofessional and disrespectful way in which to do so.

114 posted on 04/14/2006 2:20:14 PM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson