Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHO CAN SECURE A GOP PRESIDENTIAL VICTORY IN '08?
Sierra Times ^ | 4/13/2006 | Christopher G. Adamo

Posted on 04/13/2006 6:33:27 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy

With the Democrat Presidential primaries apparently already completed, and Hillary Clinton declared the uncontested winner, it might behoove Republicans to start pondering a workable strategy for the 2008 election cycle.

Thus far, it has been the “business as usual” wing of the party, with such notable past candidates as Bob Dole, who are working hardest to define the impending race. And true to form, if they continue to dominate we should resign ourselves to “President Hillary,” nationalized health care, and the grim eventuality of our children being raised by some bureaucratic monstrosity of a “village.”

The list of Republican names presently being floated as potential candidates contains some notables with substantial and creditable accomplishments (such as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and former New York Mayor Rudy Guiliani). Yet their support for a liberal social agenda constitutes an insurmountable liability.

Along with Rice and Guiliani is the standard litany of Republican imposters, chief among them being Senator John McCain of Arizona and Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, either of whom would drive the pivotal “values voters” of the 2004 election away from the polls in record numbers.

Romney has been weak and indecisive on such issues as traditional marriage, and the sanctity of life. And when politically expedient, McCain has been openly hostile to the Christian Right. Ultimately, this band of moderates is devoid of any who could connect with the conservative grassroots of “Red State America.”

To have any hope of a victory, Republicans must first recognize that they simply cannot triumph by adopting Democrat rules of engagement. No Republican candidate can prevail as a cheap imitation of his/her Democrat rival. The insipid “move to the center” strategy, which never served the Republican Party well in the past, will fare no better this time around.

Secondly, Republicans need to come to grips with the fact that their track record of success, for at least the past four decades, can be directly correlated to their ability to steadfastly advocate and advance the conservative message in the face of inevitable media attacks and character assaults.

The three issues that will define America in the coming decades, and are thus of primary concern to the electorate (despite any efforts of the liberal cabal to disparage such concerns as “narrow minded” or “simplistic”) are national security, national sovereignty, and restoration of the American culture.

Democrats can garner a sufficient plurality to secure a victory by running against such principles, as did Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996, but only when facing weak Republican opposition. But any attempt by Republican candidates to waffle or “moderate” on these issues, or any past track record of having done so, will deal a fatal blow to their candidacies. Thus far, at least among the presumed Republican “frontrunners,” prospects do not look good.

Last minute, election year “conversions” by candidates seeking to appeal to the conservative base will be no more highly regarded than Hillary’s sudden advocacy of her version of “Christianity.” And while mainstream Democrat voters regularly ignore such duplicitous reversals, the “red states” are not nearly so forgiving.

Rampant government spending with the blessings of the White House, the lack of a veto of any measure no matter how adverse to conservative America, and perhaps worst of all, the immigration issue have left George W. Bush with no political “coattails.” As a result, the best approach for Republican candidates would be to treat him as an irrelevancy.

This being the reality of the current political climate, only a few individuals yet stand out. Senator George Allen, of Virginia is one such personality. And although Senators have not historically done well when attempting to ascend to the White House, Allen was also a very successful Virginia Governor. Overall, he can credibly campaign as a stalwart conservative. And that is a winning strategy.

One individual who embodies the qualities of principle and leadership so sadly lacking among the present cadre of GOP hopefuls is Representative J.D. Hayworth of Arizona. Admittedly, Congressmen have had even less success at winning presidential elections than Senators. Furthermore, to date Hayworth has shown little or no interest in running.

But he is a solid conservative and a fearless advocate of proper border control, and possesses the charisma and devotion to principle that are essential to brave the storms of “political correctness” currently decimating legitimate debate in Washington. He displays a clearer understanding of the immigration issue than anyone on the Senate side, and is spirited in his determination to confront and, more importantly, to fix the problem

The next presidential election cycle is looming close at hand, and Hayworth would have to move quickly to establish an organization sufficient for an undertaking of this enormity. But by so doing, he could completely change the political landscape.

The ongoing demonstrations throughout America by advocates of illegal immigration reveal an ominous and metastasizing threat to the country’s future. And whether it is Hayworth himself, or someone else with similar qualifications who will take the reins of leadership, the events of the past few weeks prove that such a leader is desperately needed.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allen2008; georgeallen; giulianipence; hillary2008; pencegiuliani; penceromney; romneypence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-374 next last
Yet their support for a liberal social agenda constitutes an insurmountable liability.

Just what we desperately need now, a "moderate" who stands for nothing.

1 posted on 04/13/2006 6:33:28 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Tom Tancredo can win.


2 posted on 04/13/2006 6:34:49 AM PDT by noobiangod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: FerdieMurphy
The insipid “move to the center” strategy, which never served the Republican Party well in the past, will fare no better this time around.

President Bush ran as a compassionate conservative and was widely regarded as a center right politician. As he gained in popularity after the primary, the press started calling him a radical conservative in an effort to hasten his defeat.

All politicians move to the center at election time.

4 posted on 04/13/2006 6:38:31 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noobiangod

Tancredo/Pence '08


5 posted on 04/13/2006 6:38:45 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: noobiangod

Tom Tancredo cannot win. Not in a gazillion years.


6 posted on 04/13/2006 6:38:52 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: noobiangod
"Tom Tancredo can win."

I will second that. He is the most senior GOP candidate who retains any credibility. The rest of the frequently mentioned leadership are either crooks, traitors, or RINOs.
7 posted on 04/13/2006 6:39:37 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach
All politicians move to the center at election time.

I agree they certainly do.

8 posted on 04/13/2006 6:40:08 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Tom Tancredo cannot win. Not in a gazillion years.

Why?
9 posted on 04/13/2006 6:40:23 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Allen might win, but it is necessary for any of the other deserving and interested to get involved sooner rather than later. Name recognition helps.


10 posted on 04/13/2006 6:40:42 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pheadra
Be prepared to duck! ;-) Peeking Over Fence
11 posted on 04/13/2006 6:40:54 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

When was the last time a Representative was elected to the presidency?

When was the last time a candidate suggested that we nuke an entire population elected?


12 posted on 04/13/2006 6:41:12 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

I have done some research on JD and I would probably vote for him. The immigration issue has become my #1 issue (because of where I live) and he is definitely on top of that.


13 posted on 04/13/2006 6:41:52 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

The winning issue of the election is immigration as guns were in 2000, and terror was in 2004.


14 posted on 04/13/2006 6:42:57 AM PDT by Vision ("There are no limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Allen/Pence

Allen/ Dr.Colburn

Pence/Dr. Colburn

Cheney/Rumsfeld --- just to drive the left CRAZY !


15 posted on 04/13/2006 6:42:58 AM PDT by Mayflower Sister (DEMOCRAT: THE PARTY OF COWARDS AND TRAITORS, and I almost forgot... BABY KILLERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister

Does anyone know where Condi Rice stands on illegal immigration?


16 posted on 04/13/2006 6:43:40 AM PDT by Mayflower Sister (DEMOCRAT: THE PARTY OF COWARDS AND TRAITORS, and I almost forgot... BABY KILLERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

The federal budget is out of control.
There is virtually nothing being done about illegal immigration. Our borders are definately not secure.
The DPW deal/mess.
The war in Iraq has had planning errors, and now we can't get them to agree on constitution/government.
Offshore outsourcing is the order of the day.
If we unilaterally attack Iran, many more middle of the road voters will move left.

Hmmmm... I'd say a GOP victory in '08 would be VERY difficult to achieve.


17 posted on 04/13/2006 6:44:30 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister

So far she hasn't mentioned anything on it. It's a shame, but she's not going to run anyway.


18 posted on 04/13/2006 6:44:58 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister

LOL.

I'd love Senator Cornyn to run. He's got the entire presidential look, demeanor and the politics to attract conservatives.


19 posted on 04/13/2006 6:44:59 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
To have any hope of a victory, Republicans must first recognize that they simply cannot triumph by adopting Democrat rules of engagement. No Republican candidate can prevail as a cheap imitation of his/her Democrat rival. The insipid “move to the center” strategy, which never served the Republican Party well in the past, will fare no better this time around.

Secondly, Republicans need to come to grips with the fact that their track record of success, for at least the past four decades, can be directly correlated to their ability to steadfastly advocate and advance the conservative message in the face of inevitable media attacks and character assaults.

The three issues that will define America in the coming decades, and are thus of primary concern to the electorate (despite any efforts of the liberal cabal to disparage such concerns as “narrow minded” or “simplistic”) are national security, national sovereignty, and restoration of the American culture.

AMEN and AMEN! Repeat this over and over again! If the GOP does not heed these words, they will be willingly handing the POTUS office back to the socialist-democrats in 2008. - OB1

20 posted on 04/13/2006 6:45:36 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (America is the land of the free BECAUSE of the BRAVE !! BUILD THE WALL! PROTECT OUR BORDERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-374 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson