> So what's she to do?
She could have read things in their proper context. She saw a complaint about *her* as being a complaint about her *religion*. Specifically: "I seem to recall *some* religion or other had a minor provision that said that "bearing false witness" was a general no-no (it was probably in the small print, somewhere in a little-used Appendix at the back).... but I'm sure you'll get special dispensation."
Where do you see a slam of some religion in *that*? Only the completely sarcasm-impaired would miss the message.
This question is what I believe she was responding to when she provided the posts; she was answering the question you asked. Since the answer was not really specific about what *that* you were referring to, she cannot really be faulted for how she answered it. You could have specified instead of leaving the antecedent unclear.
Also, implying that she is a stalker because she provided information asked for is a false accusation. Has she been following you thread to thread harassing you? Has she been bringing up the same issue with you everytime she posts to you on those other threads? A quick perusal of her posting history for the last three weeks shows no other posts to you other than the ones on this thread. All she did is provide evidence as evolutionists like to demand, and when she did she was criticized and I think that that implication about her is out of line and uncalled for.
P.S. You're supposed to ping someone when you talk about them.