Skip to comments.
Two killings test right of self-defense
The Baltimore Sun ^
| April 8, 2006
| Jennifer McMenamin
Posted on 04/10/2006 9:11:53 AM PDT by neverdem
Each case may turn on whether life was in danger
Karen L. Foxx had sought court orders to keep her estranged husband away, had filed criminal assault charges against him and changed her phone number. She also bought a gun to protect herself, and last Saturday, her lawyer says, Foxx did just that when she fatally shot her husband.
Now the Randallstown woman awaits word on whether she will be charged with a crime - one of two recent cases in which the legal right to self-defense is under examination.
The Randallstown shooting occurred two weeks after a 57-year-old gas station owner was attacked by three would-be robbers at the upscale Village of Cross Keys shopping center in North Baltimore, grabbed his own gun and fatally shot one of the assailants.
In such cases, the decision to file charges often hangs on whether prosecutors or grand jurors determine that the shooters reasonably believed that their lives were threatened before pulling the trigger, legal experts interviewed this week said.
In a 2001 case involving two brothers who killed a man after lying in wait for burglars, a Baltimore County grand jury decided the shooting was justified, even though the intruders were unarmed.
In a 2003 case, two businessmen were acquitted of murder charges after shooting a man who broke into their East Baltimore warehouse.
Given the police accounts of the two recent shootings, the experts interviewed say it's unlikely that either Foxx or the gas station owner, Mark A. Beckwith, will be charged.
"I don't think a crime has occurred. I don't think it's even close," said Richard M. Karceski, a criminal defense attorney who represented one of two brothers cleared in the 2001 shooting of three unarmed intruders at the brothers' concrete plant in Glyndon. "Just because an unfortunate situation..."
(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: banglist; donutwatch; libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
1
posted on
04/10/2006 9:11:55 AM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
**sniff**..I love happy endings...
2
posted on
04/10/2006 9:13:59 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Islam is a religion of peace and they'll behead 13 year old girls to prove it...)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
3
posted on
04/10/2006 9:14:48 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'll have the roast duck, with the mango salsa..)
To: Travis McGee; DaveLoneRanger; Joe Brower; Mr. Mojo
4
posted on
04/10/2006 9:16:56 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: traviskicks
5
posted on
04/10/2006 9:17:58 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: neverdem
"I don't think a crime has occurred. I don't think it's even close," said Richard M. Karceski, a criminal defense attorney.... Judging from what I read, he is right -- unless self-defense is now a crime.
6
posted on
04/10/2006 9:19:09 AM PDT
by
Logophile
To: freepatriot32
A round of applause for the Armed Citizens.
7
posted on
04/10/2006 9:19:35 AM PDT
by
Supernatural
(When they come a wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
To: freepatriot32
Those who vote Libertarian need their heads examined how they are held is irrelevant.
8
posted on
04/10/2006 9:20:05 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: Logophile
But this is the Peoples' DemocRATic Cesspool of Maryland, so ya never know.
9
posted on
04/10/2006 9:21:46 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Logophile
This happened in Maryland, they could easily go to jail. Just one of a thousand reasons we now reside in Virginia.
10
posted on
04/10/2006 9:32:20 AM PDT
by
conservativewasp
(Liberals lie for sport and hate our country.)
To: conservativewasp
you mean orders for protection don't stop people intent on harming you?
who knew!?
11
posted on
04/10/2006 9:39:03 AM PDT
by
Rakkasan1
(they love you in Mexico until you pay in pesos.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Yeah, a nice warm fuzzy to start the week off. So many scum bags getting ventilated in one article :-D
12
posted on
04/10/2006 9:45:17 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: Rakkasan1
Armed citizens are taking out more criminals than the police in MD. But who's counting?
To: Logophile
... unless self-defense is now a crime. This is Maryland we're talking about. (I'm sorry to say, my home state)
14
posted on
04/10/2006 10:22:58 AM PDT
by
BFM
To: ArrogantBustard
You are ignorant and don't really know what you are talking about. Maryland is a beautiful state, and we do have a Republican governor. I also will point out that Maryland's economy is doing just a little bit better than Virginia's economy right now. The only thing VA has going for it is good taxes, which is negated by the fact that there are far fewer high-paying jobs in that state. Northern VA is about as liberal as it gets, and if the trend keeps up Va as a whole will be a blue state in a few years. I suppose you think Richmond and Hampton are lovely places, but last time I checked Richmond has a higher per capita violent crime rate than any city in Maryland including Baltimore. Maybe you should think before you insult an entire state, and let us know when any Fortune 500 companies or professional sport franchises move to your state.
15
posted on
04/10/2006 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
Naptowne
To: neverdem
In a 2001 case involving two brothers who killed a man after lying in wait for burglars, a Baltimore County grand jury decided the shooting was justified, even though the intruders were unarmed.
A few years ago, here in Modesto, some guy bought and started remodeling a beautiful old turn of the century home in one of the town nicest neighborhoods. Over a several week period, the home was broken into a half dozen times and robbed of tools, building supplies, and anything valuable that could be carried off. The police blew him off ("Whaddya want us to do, stand guard?"), his neighbors didn't see a thing, and his insurance company was getting very antsy about the payouts. So he did what any red-blooded American would do...he grabbed his sleeping bag and his shotgun, and camped out in the middle of his new home. The very first night, the perp took a prybar, busted open the new door, and was met with a square center mass load of 00 buck...he was dead before he hit the floor. The police showed up, saw the prybar in the guys hand, and let the guy go with a handshake and a pat on the back.
This being whiny liberal California, there was the predictable indignant squawks from the rabid gun grabbers about how this guy murdered an "innocent thief" over property, but they were ignored and the man was never charged.
To: BFM
Maryland may be predominantly democrat, but we certainly don't produce a Massachussetts or California brand of liberalism. In fact the state is mostly conservative if you cancel out Baltimore City and PG County. In every such instance I can recall (including the ones provided in the article)no home or business owner has been prosecuted in the state for killing and intruder in self defense. I am not saying that it has never happened, but I cannot remember it happening. I also note that every firearm that is legal in the United States is also legal in Maryland.
17
posted on
04/10/2006 10:35:38 AM PDT
by
Naptowne
To: neverdem
". . .one of two recent cases in which the legal right to self-defense is under examination. . ."
Hmmm. . .when I last checked, self-defense was a moral and ethical duty. . .
To: neverdem
Sounds like the lady and the attendant have a good chance of acquittal. Hope the trial doesn't cost 'em too much.
19
posted on
04/10/2006 10:41:38 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: buckeyemd
It is worth pointing out that this article appeared in the Baltimore Sun, whic is ideological bastard child of the the New York Times. I seriously doubt these people will be charged unless there is strong evidence to suggest that it was not self defense.
20
posted on
04/10/2006 10:44:53 AM PDT
by
Naptowne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson