Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

You have to love the bias on both sides. Arutz Sheva calls it a plan "to uproot Jewish settlements" while the anti-Israel plan calls it "annexation of Jewish colonies". Reality (all hype aside) is that it is a combination of withdrawal from the bulk of Judea and Samaria where the Palestinians live, the strengthening of settlements where about 90% of the settlers live, and the annexation of major settlement blocs and strategic areas in Judea and Samaria.

Of course, I don't expect you and the rest of the not one inch crowd to mention annexation, as important as that is.


2 posted on 04/09/2006 1:20:14 PM PDT by anotherview ("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: anotherview
Bias? One man's ceiling, is another man's floor.

It is also reality is that this bunch has been trying to give back Judea and Samaria from the first day it was taken in war. The idea of "strengthening the settlements" is the latest propaganda to make Judea and Samaria Judenrein. This leadership is tenuous and is likely to fail in less than 2 years so they are making all sorts of pronouncements about what they want to do, regardless of the support they have for it. Their time is short and they know it.

The Arabs' appetites for destruction are only whetted with every withdrawal and even if VoldOmert is successful in ruining another 25,000 Jews' lives, it will only provide another place for the Arabs to fire Katyushas from.

3 posted on 04/09/2006 3:28:48 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson