To: RobbyS
Many of the brass hated Rumsfeld from the git-go. Clinto had left them in charge of the cooky jar, and they felt entitled to call the shots. If we were short of men after 9/11, it was owing to the stewardship of men like Shinseki, who was more interested in berets than in bodyarmour. What's wrong with the military being in charge of itself and calling the shots?
Maybe Rumsfeld is still reviewing the troop deployments for Operation Iraqi Freedom .... maybe Rumsfeld still thinks there isn't an insurgency going on in Iraq. The national emergency declared after 9-11 ends this September ...What is Rumsfeld's plan in Iraq WITHOUT using the National Guard? Maybe that's also Clinton's and Shinseki's fault ....
119 posted on
04/10/2006 8:23:09 AM PDT by
Yasotay
To: Yasotay
What's wrong with the military being in charge of itself and calling the shots?
Not sure but I think I read something about it in the U.S. Constitution.
121 posted on
04/10/2006 11:18:09 AM PDT by
j35jazz
(Replacements)
To: Yasotay
Maybe Rumsfeld is counting the number he actually needs in Iraq with those he does not need. Pardon me, maybe the generals have already done this. My guess is that there will be a drawdown sometime this year.
122 posted on
04/10/2006 11:51:13 AM PDT by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson