Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clawrence3
The two should not be grouped under the same rubric.

President Carter was not inviting members of the Armed Forces at that time to desert their posts, or giving a retroactive stamp of approval to illegal behavior.

What President Bush is doing right now has no precedent.

Even comparing it to to President Reagan's disastrous amnesty proposal isn't fair, because the lawmakers enacting this sham make no pretension of actually enforcing the provisions of this proposed law.

974 posted on 04/06/2006 12:36:31 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies ]


To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Well, of course not - Carter was in the Naval Academy and not President at the time of said infractions - I believe Johnson presided over most of those. Why pass "amnesty" if you aren't going to grant those provision under the law.


980 posted on 04/06/2006 12:39:11 PM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson