Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clawrence3
"What kind of 'proof' would satisfy you?"

Satisfying me isn't the issue. There is no viable proof that these illegals can offer, something that our "elected representatives" in Washing DC know fully well.

But even that point is not the true issue here. Any amnesty, under any other name or pretense, is still rewarding those who have blatantly broken the law. It is a clear sign that one's nation is gravely ill when those at the hightest levels of authority ignore the law with impunity.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

721 posted on 04/06/2006 11:06:28 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Brower

Were you against Carter's "amnesty" for draft-dodgers and deserters? What if part of this "amnesty" requires everyone to get in line AFTER those already seeking legal status the right way?


737 posted on 04/06/2006 11:11:44 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Brower; clawrence3

I concur. Proof for me shouldn't matter. The propensity to ignore or blatantly break our laws should be evidence enough that papering over a past infraction will only lead to another - yet, this time the prize is bigger - it's citizenship, so there'll be more of an effort to defraud.


754 posted on 04/06/2006 11:16:20 AM PDT by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson