[sinkspur]

If you're too ashamed to defend your positions-which doesn't surprise me, since less than 10%, if that, of this board's users agree with them-then that's your problem, not mine.

You don't even know what my position is, except that I favor a balanced approach to dealing with illegal immigration. At least my way has a chance of being enacted into law. Your "let's send 'em all back" solution has NO CHANCE of passing.

You'll end up with no bill, and the status-quo, which is giving you major diaper rash, will continue.

I don't care about FReeper polls. They don't even represent what FReepers think since most don't even bother to vote (if the numbers that are thrown around here about membership are accurate).

[Do not dub me shapka broham]

A "balanced approach."

"Comprehensive reform."

Why don't you throw out another trite banality or utterly worthless euphemism, which masks the issues at stake?

I'm sure you have a million of them.

I could care less whether or not your approach has a chance of being enacted into law.

I repeat, no action is better than shoving this amnesty monstrosity-which over 60% of Americans vehemently oppose-down our collective throat.

Nothing would please me more than for Congress to go into recess right now, and never return.

If there was a bill in your state legislature that would let people invade your home, would you support it?

Contingent, of course, on its ability to garner enough votes...