My post: "No, but a Mexican does have to successfully cross the border to become an illegal immigrant."
Where did I mention an RPG. I said that for a person to become an illegal immigrant, that person must cross the border.
I have to believe you are either on drugs or just trying to get the thread off topic. Either way, no more replies to you.
I mentioned the RPG argument. But, lets see how you did with it. Lets go through the posting history, shall we?:
To: BigSkyFreeperI'm sure after yesterday's RPG attack on Israel, he got the last laugh.A wall doesn't have to 100% effective to have value. I doubt the person in Isreal climbed the wall anyway.
By your logic, if we lose one person in Afganistan then the mission was a failure.
1,364 posted on 04/06/2006 3:53:35 PM MDT by JeffAtlanta[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1360 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
-----
To: inquestUnless you're saying that the terrorist who launched the RPG attack got over the wall himselfWhy does he have to scale the wall to use his RPG?
1,411 posted on 04/06/2006 4:11:24 PM MDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1399 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
-----
To: BigSkyFreeperWhy does he have to scale the wall to use his RPG?No, but a Mexican does have to successfully cross the border to become an illegal immigrant.
1,421 posted on 04/06/2006 4:15:08 PM MDT by JeffAtlanta[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1411 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
-----
I appears you clearly couldn't answer my question. If you want to refrain from posting to me, knock yourself out. You were the one who said "A wall doesn't have to 100% effective to have value.". I said the wall would SLOW the flow, not STOP it. I don't deal with posters that can't handle a simple question with an honest answer, or refuse to read posts they reply to. You seem to be the purveyor of such debate skill.