I didn't say it was. I haven't read the bill, but what I've heard, I don't like.
That's different from saying that I wouldn't support any bill that has an amnesty component. My view is that the most important thing is to stop additional illegal immigration. If I have to trade some form of amnesty to get it, at least that's better than the status quo. But amnesty without significantly improved border protection is no better, and perhaps worse, than the status quo.
We've tried this-repeatedly-in the past, and each attempt to "reform" immigration has simply led to greater and greater waves of illegal aliens crossing our border.