Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void; MadIvan

Thanks much for paging me, NAV.

Ivan, I apologize for the additional ping, but I think we could really use the perspective of a Londonistaner in this thread.


281 posted on 04/06/2006 12:37:27 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback ("I was in such a hurry to climb that tree, I punched a squirrel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback

Muslims represent far too small a percentage of the population for this scenario to be conceivable.

I think we do need to take Islam more seriously as a threat, but this is definitely overblown.

Regards, Ivan


352 posted on 04/06/2006 2:46:56 PM PDT by MadIvan (Ya hya chouhada! Dune fans, visit - http://www.thesietch.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

There are two further reasons why this scenario doesn't work - it assumes a traditional war between Islam and the West. We know for a fact that the Islamists are cowards - they won't fight soldiers directly, at best they'll do hit and run raids, and they'll victimise women and children on airplanes. Secondly, this also assumes that the Shia and Sunni have patched up their differences to the point where they're not fighting each other any longer. Unlikely.

Regards, Ivan


360 posted on 04/06/2006 3:12:04 PM PDT by MadIvan (Ya hya chouhada! Dune fans, visit - http://www.thesietch.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson