[VadeRetro]

It's about following the evidence, not cranking out some tortured "interpretation" that leaves a Bronze Age religious text word-for-word "inerrant." If you're not letting things just be what they look like, you're not approaching science the right way.

[Creationist]

So is that how you look at Newtons work, Louis Pasteur, Washington Carver, Albert Einstein, Socrates,William Harvey, Jan B. van Helmont, Franscesco Redi, Marcello Malpighi, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Charles Darwin. They wrote their work long ago.

The problem is not letting thing be what they look like, because I am not saying these phenomena do not exist, I am saying that the evolutionist perspective always dictates the old universe scenario. When it is clear that the evidence can easily be and would be correctly interpreted as a young universe