While you are correct with your conclusion, which is back up by the vast body of serious science on the subject, you can easily observe there are those on this thread who refuse to deal with the reality.
I think the rampant denial is based on some form of self validation. (out side of religious reasons) The heavy denial posts are there in order to justify their own decisions. They see what they want to believe not the facts.
Nothing is going to change their minds and they will continue to mutilate the nerve endings of young boys no matter how many studies continue to show the stictly cosmetic nature of the procedure or how many adult men who have be thusly injured testify as to the loss of sensation.
People (out side of religion reasons) are clininging to the practice of circumcision because they don't want to be wrong at all costs.
I am much more optimistic. In my experience when parents learn that infant circumcision is not medically necessary and not recommended by any professional medical organization in the world, they are more likely to protect their son from unnecessary genital surgery. The national infant circumcision rate in the USA was 57% in 2003. It was even lower in the western states. Less than one third of the newborn boys in the western states were circumcised in 2003. Infant circumcision is definitely going out of style.