Posted on 04/04/2006 8:17:38 AM PDT by RepublicNewbie
Clinton and Carter just have to have the limelight while out of the Oval Office. Therefore, they claim anything that will make some sort of headline. Usually it's pathetic.
Now BC has said he'd shake hands with Hamas if the Islamic killers would assure the world of the same peace that Arafat assured.
Naturally, BC is on his way to the mental ward. But in the meantime, we have to endure such tripe.
BC and Carter continue to work against the very nation that put them in office. However, that too seems to be a current fad among those who have given up on the republic.
According to the BBC, BC said he would palsy up to the Hamas "if they provided the same assurances on rejecting terror as the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat."
"Assurances" "rejecting terror" "Arafat." What language is it that we are attempting to speak here?
(Excerpt) Read more at postchronicle.com ...
They might as well be right there with Dr.Mengele or Saddam, in the torture chambers and doing themselves.
But Democrates would not care, they only care about AbuGhraib games on the hands of the GOP, not about real cases of mass torture promoted and encouraged by Dems.
The blindness to Stalin's legacy continues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.