1000 Years for Revenge. And if you think that SUPPORTS you, we didn't read the same book. Yes, he EXPLORES the possibility---I read that with great interest because I thought, "a ha! Here is someone else who views this link as credible." In the end, however, he didn't. It's been 2-3 years since I read it, but I'm pretty sure that the upshot of his chapter was, "interesting stuff, no real proof."
You're pretty sure? You asked for dates and yet were given the same link, complete with DATES, four times. Maybe your memory is a little hazy on this matter.
Because the Washington Post clearly is quoting Lancy when he says there is a growing body of evidence...
bbl