I've pinged you three times now to a Washington Post article that you are 100% incorrect about Lance. He said unequivocably in that article that he believes there is a ME terrorism connection to the Murrah Building bombing.
Did you miss those pings or are you just ignoring evidence which contradicts your posts about Lance?
No, just because you "ping" someone doesn't mean a) you are right, or b) that it is the most recent thing Lance has said on it. Lance has modified his position, but I don't know what it is today. As of the time of his book, he discounted the notion. Sorry, I don't keep up with every interview posted by every person ever to deal with terrorism. I'd like to know specifically what new evidence Lance saw from the time of his book.