Here's an example... What happened to Jose Padilla being John Doe #2? That made sense to me early on, now this Al-Hussaini guy makes sense. Who's who?
So you're telling us it has to be simple or you don't believe it? Or can't follow it?
Is that kind of belittling really necessary? At least -I- am trying to do something constructive.
After seeing Padilla's photo, someone surmised that he looked at lot like the sketch of John Doe 2. Totally bogus. There is loads of eye witness testimony, however, about Hussain Al-Hussaini. Unfortunately, it has been kept from the public.
I'm sorry; I've seen so many people who absolutely belittle any possible connection that I'm suspicious.
You've done an admirable summary and I thank you for it.
Personally, I think that although Padilla looks like John Doe #2, there is too much compelling evidence that it was Al-Husseini.