Yes, Peach. I've read all this stuff. Even putting the coverup aside, I've been unable to make a concise timeline/plot of what supposedly happened from it all. Have you?
I don't expect anyone to KNOW why someone is covering something up, but you have to at least have a THEORY!!
Otherwise, people just look at this and say, "if there was something to it, Schippers and the NYT and Bush and others wouldn't ignore it (or try to cover it up.)
Frankly, I don't think the coverup is all that important right now if the underlying plot of OKC is not crystal clear to begin with.
If the coverup were exposed by credible (and that's one reason there is effort to discredit Jana) persons, a past sitting president would be ripe for treason trial and imprisonment ... and the current President will not abide that despite the degeneracy of the past president.
Dave Schippers isn't ignoring this. He is trying to get this before Congress. He stands behind Jayna 100%.
Where did you get that David Schippers is ignoring this? He's endorsed Jayna's book 100% and done what is in his power to get Congress to pay attention.
Not to be confrontational, but it's hard to believe you've read the links and think Schippers isn't onboard.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good grief! Do you always deal in circular logic?
The "underlying plot of OKC is not crystal clear to begin with", because there has been a complex -- and largely successful -- coverup.