Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml1954
The part that jumped out at me was the 'that occurred previous to written history' part. Sounds like it covers astronomy, cosmology, geology, archeology, anthropology, etc. as well as biology.

It also rules out Genesis. No human observer was there for the six days of creation. Even Adam, who arrived on day six, didn't witness his own appearance, and he was asleep when Eve was created. So where does that leave us?

28 posted on 04/02/2006 12:22:06 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry

It also rules out Genesis. No human observer was there for the six days of creation. Even Adam, who arrived on day six, didn't witness his own appearance, and he was asleep when Eve was created. So where does that leave us?

I dunno. While it rules out teaching Genesis as scince it requires substantial 'critical analysis' of much of biology, astronomy, cosmology, geology, archeology, anthropology, etc.

Sounds to me like the objective may be to indoctrinate that "science can't be trusted".

32 posted on 04/02/2006 12:39:27 PM PDT by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson