To: Dog Gone
"The battle to teach what is science and what is not is a guaranteed loser for the creationist side."
Really, the theory of evolution modeled upon the survival of the fittest, requiring the intervention of government programs has been the model followed by the public school system for decades. These children are taught they are just descendants of the rest of the global animals.
Too bad the evolutionists won't accept the test results of their system of education.
To: All
Here is a link to the
full text of the bill being discussed. It applies to all science courses, but it singles out biology (the only science dealt with specifically) with this provision:
If a theory or hypothesis of biological origins is taught, a critical analysis of such theory or hypothesis shall be taught in a substantive amount.
12 posted on
04/02/2006 10:50:12 AM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
To: Just mythoughts
Really, the theory of evolution modeled upon the survival of the fittest, requiring the intervention of government programs has been the model followed by the public school system for decades.
The theory of evolution is not, in any way, modelled on a requirement of government programs. In fact, governmnet programs are neither an element of the theory nor a logical outgrowth of the theory. I do not know where you have obtained your information, but it is clearly not from an informed source.
19 posted on
04/02/2006 11:49:24 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Just mythoughts
"Really, the theory of evolution modeled upon the survival of the fittest, requiring the intervention of government programs has been the model followed by the public school system for decades."
What government programs?
22 posted on
04/02/2006 11:54:10 AM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("Things are not what they always seem.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson