To: SampleMan
I can point you to a leading Korean scientist that's good at cloning, or perhaps you're interested in claims of cold fusion?
Neither would be examples of what I asked.
Gosh, you got me. I don't have a quote of a "leading scientist" saying, "I declare that there is nothing more to learn about evolution."
So when you stated "Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.", you were not attempting to imply that there are any scientists at Princeton who do say that everything there is to know about evolution is already known? If so, then why did you make a comment in the first place, given that it could have such implications?
75 posted on
03/29/2006 6:28:04 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
You need to take lessons, so that you too can play
THE TROLL GAME:
Step one: Troll makes outrageous, unsupportable statement about scientists and Kool-Aid. (post 1)
Step two: Someone asks for verification.
Step three: Troll dodges by making reference to some earlier thread. (post 10)
Step four: Someone else asks for verification.
Step five: Troll dodges again. (post 36)
Step six: Another person asks for verification.
Step seven: Troll dodges again, mentions cold fusion. (post 38)
Step eight: Troll claims his "rabid" opposition is amusing. (post 42)
Step nine: Troll dodges accusation that he made up his original statement, tells poster to stay focused. (post 45)
Step ten: Troll accuse a poster of improper behavior, without providing evidence. (Post 51)
Step eleven: Etc., etc., etc. [Continue until thread is moved to Smokey Backroom, at which point you've won.]
76 posted on
03/29/2006 6:49:23 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson