Skip to comments.
DNA could modify itself with no outside help, say biologists
Princeton University ^
| March 28, 2006
| Chad Boutin
Posted on 03/29/2006 1:47:22 PM PST by SampleMan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-210 next last
To: AntiGuv
21
posted on
03/29/2006 3:13:26 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(You are what you think you are......Qu’est que c’est)
To: SampleMan
>DNA could
modify itself ...
![](http://www.cafes.net/ditch/midwife1.jpg) |
Maybe DNA has a sense of humor and is effing with us . . .
|
To: peyton randolph
>Maybe it is Xenu attacking your thetans
![](http://www.lacoctelera.com/brandcode/imagen/tom%20cruise%20principal.jpg)
"Hey. Is that a joke?
Do I look like I'm laughing?
Life is serious.
Can we talk a bit?
Hey, don't push. Can I leave you
some literature . . ."
To: PatrickHenry
Very curious. Thanks for the ping.
24
posted on
03/29/2006 3:29:30 PM PST
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: SampleMan
I just can't resist another juicy evolution story. Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid. What an irresponsible thing to say. Your B.S. theory on how science works and how scientists work is just plain wrong. Science is properly set up so that no scientific theory is absolute unlike your absolute belief that Genesis is absolutely correct no matter what.
25
posted on
03/29/2006 3:31:02 PM PST
by
hawkaw
To: timburton; Ichneumon
26
posted on
03/29/2006 3:35:25 PM PST
by
Quark2005
(Confidence follows from consilience.)
To: theFIRMbss
Can I leave you
some literature . . .
ROTFLMAO.
27
posted on
03/29/2006 3:43:23 PM PST
by
peyton randolph
(As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
To: bobdsmith
no scientist has ever claimed such a thing period True, of course. But perhaps it would be better if you paid no attention to the flaming troll...
28
posted on
03/29/2006 3:45:37 PM PST
by
balrog666
(Irrational beliefs inspire irrational posts.)
To: SampleMan
This fascinating and unanticipated new property of DNA has the potential to cause substantial damage to our cells...."Sounds like a pessimistic democrat..The glass is half empty.
I prefer to be optimistic that this may be the key to the evolution of species whether under the direction and control of a higher being, or not....as you prefer to believe.
29
posted on
03/29/2006 3:48:58 PM PST
by
Rapscallion
(Democrats: Supporting the conquest of America since VietNam.)
To: SampleMan
Apparently not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid.
I was unaware that any leading scientists have made such a claim. Do you have a reference?
30
posted on
03/29/2006 3:51:14 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: timburton
Looks like the Law of Entropy strikes again, and the biggest objection (apart from irrationality of matter being eternal) to genetic evolution stays.
What, exactly, does the "Law of Entropy" state?
There are NO good mutations
I am afraid that your claim is demonstratably false.
31
posted on
03/29/2006 3:52:28 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: SampleMan
not all the scientists at Princeton are drinking the "everything there is to know about evolution is already known" Kool-Aid. Could you point us to a list of those who claim we know everything? Thanks
To: SampleMan
Great post. Thank you. Let the debate begin again.
33
posted on
03/29/2006 3:55:17 PM PST
by
Rapscallion
(Democrats: Supporting the conquest of America since VietNam.)
To: Quark2005
Why did you double-post the nylon bug?
Let me guess, "Nothing beats a great pair...of L'Eggs!"
Cheers!
34
posted on
03/29/2006 4:34:26 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: SampleMan
But the team found that if a stem-loop forms from a particular sequence of DNA, one of the genetic teeth will fall spontaneously from that side of the zipper, and the weakened strand will eventually break apart in that spot unless it is repaired by enzymes in the cell. Fresco said this sort of activity seems akin to self-mutilation at first glance. Reminds me of how often the crevo threads themselves "unwind" over time ;-)
(Heads for exit, running for cover...)
Cheers!
35
posted on
03/29/2006 4:37:26 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Virginia-American
Could you point us to a list of those who claim we know everything? Thanks There's a list? Its worse than I thought.
To: grey_whiskers
Why did you double-post the nylon bug? Must be a "bug" in my coding. : )
37
posted on
03/29/2006 4:46:25 PM PST
by
Quark2005
(Confidence follows from consilience.)
To: Dimensio
I was unaware that any leading scientists have made such a claim. Do you have a reference? I can point you to a leading Korean scientist that's good at cloning, or perhaps you're interested in claims of cold fusion?
Gosh, you got me. I don't have a quote of a "leading scientist" saying, "I declare that there is nothing more to learn about evolution." However, finding a lot of quotes that say the equivilent of, "What total nonsense, shut up" isn't that difficult. I believe that's pretty much been the line on contrary scientific thought since about 50 A.D.
To: SampleMan
" I can point you to a leading Korean scientist that's good at cloning, or perhaps you're interested in claims of cold fusion?"
You mean those people said that,
"everything there is to know about evolution is already known"?
That's odd. Evolution had nothing to do with their fields. I am sure you can provide documentation though, you wouldn't just make things up...
" However, finding a lot of quotes that say the equivilent(sic) of, "What total nonsense, shut up" isn't that difficult."
Then produce them.
39
posted on
03/29/2006 4:55:34 PM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: SampleMan
So you just made it up, the part about science claiming to know everything.
40
posted on
03/29/2006 4:56:25 PM PST
by
js1138
(~()):~)>)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-210 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson