Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Potowmack
You'd have to look at whether the rule had disparate impact...

That's an asinine standard. Banning drunkenness at work has a disparate impact on alcoholics in the office.

90 posted on 03/29/2006 11:03:15 AM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the Peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Shalom Israel
That's an asinine standard. Banning drunkenness at work has a disparate impact on alcoholics in the office.

It's a two step process. In that case, the rule has a disparate impact on people who are protected by certain laws (the ADA), but the basis behind the rule isn't to discriminate against people who are protected by the ADA, it's meant to increase on-the-job safety as well as productivity.

I agree, though, that the rules have become somewhat byzantine. My wife represents employers in employment law issues, so I hear some great stories.

97 posted on 03/29/2006 11:06:56 AM PST by Potowmack ("In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." Brian Mulroney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson