Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohioan from Florida

I was referring to Dr. Cranford, who did examine Terri, but didn't use all the means at his disposal to determine the extent of Terri's faculties.

I'm not clear what other means medical experts feel should have used. What means? What information would have been added? The CT scan alone was pretty convincing.

268 posted on 03/29/2006 4:06:50 PM PST by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: retMD

Well, I guess we may have to agree to disagree. I think that Dr. Cranford is the kind of doctor who stops looking for the positive when he doesn't want to find it. Precisely because he says the things he does, I cannot view him as an honest medical opinion.

What other information? I don't know, I'm not a doctor, but I think that Dr. Cheshire would have been willing to explore several different avenues. This was a matter of life vs. death. Cranford takes that responsibility way too casually for my tastes. I hope he is never on duty if I or anyone I care about is hospitalized.


283 posted on 03/29/2006 6:37:02 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson