Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: retMD
Agreed, and thank you for pointing out the random motions made by patients.

As to the point of brain size at autopsy -- many are attributing the small size of the brain to dehydration. From prior scans that I have seen on the web, it appeared that Terri's brain had loss mass (sorry if that is not the proper term) long prior to the autopsy. What is your opinion on this point?

106 posted on 03/27/2006 11:01:04 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: JustaDumbBlonde

As to the point of brain size at autopsy -- many are attributing the small size of the brain to dehydration. From prior scans that I have seen on the web, it appeared that Terri's brain had loss mass (sorry if that is not the proper term) long prior to the autopsy. What is your opinion on this point?

You're right, her brain had a great deal of obvious atrophy on the scans. This isn't my field, but colleagues who read scans regularly told me those were among the worst they'd seen. The details of the autopsy make it clear that groups of cells were dead and disintegrated, sometimes replaced by other tissue, as opposed to simply dehydrated.

114 posted on 03/27/2006 11:49:32 PM PST by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson