Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gomaaa

To me it seems to be a possible or impossible but unprovable in either situation.

At this point I guess travel to distant stars will come in the form of another method.


99 posted on 03/27/2006 7:03:51 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: longshadow

100


100 posted on 03/27/2006 7:04:44 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek
To me it seems to be a possible or impossible but unprovable in either situation.

At this point I guess travel to distant stars will come in the form of another method.


It's VERY provable, though not in the sense that we can actually build a spacecraft and accelerate a person in it to relativistic velocities, which is what you're picturing. We usually have to settle for subatomic particles, and we do this EVERY DAY. We simply would not be able to run a particle accelerator without accounting for special relativity. So if you have a proton travelling at 99.99999% of the speed of light (as opposed to a train) and it emits a photon (as opposed to turning on a flashlight) you get an independent confirmation of what WOULD happen if you were to be on a relativisitic train. The math is the same, and in physics that's what counts.
102 posted on 03/27/2006 7:29:53 AM PST by gomaaa (We love Green Functions!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson