Posted on 03/26/2006 8:29:27 AM PST by aculeus
A series of independent studies around the world show a significant rise in the amount of sunshine penetrating the atmosphere to be absorbed by the earths surface and turned into heat.
The research will concern climate researchers who are already predicting a rapid rise in global temperatures due to man-made emissions of so-called greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
The enhanced warming we have seen since the 1990s along with phenomena such as the widespread melting of glaciers could well be due to this increased intensity of sunlight compounding the effect of greenhouse gases, said Professor Martin Wild of the Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science in Zurich, Switzerland.
Researchers will present their findings to the European Geophysical Union conference in Vienna next week.
They reverse a 30-year trend. Measurements of sunshine levels between 1960 and 1990 had shown a decrease in the amount of sunshine reaching the earth.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
Remember when the same bunch was screaming about the coming "New Ice Age" back in the 70's?
Nah, they skillfully redirected that argument by making it cause for alarm that human-caused global warming could be made DRASTICALLY
Beat me to it!
Do you have a link? :-))
I need to make a new folder for archiving this kind of story; I can't decide if it should be labeled "Fearmongering", "Grantmongering" or "Neuroses"...
I caught that too.
and the environazis can't do shiiiite about it!!
Unless they pile into their Prius rocket ships and go to the Sun to fix it, hhhhhhehehehe....
Good point.
Yep. And, at my age, I really don't care if it gets hot or cold. Because I won't be here when it happens. But I sure like reading and hearing about all the hysteria while I'm still around!
This explains the recommendation of Dr. Edward Teller (director emeritus, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), "The Planet Needs a Sunscreen," Wall Street Journal, October 17, 1997.
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/enviro/envpd/pdenv125.html
alternatively, the brightness factor might be sufficient in itself, entirely negating the (already dubious) validity of the greenhouse gas model.
Do a search on solar output. It varies plus or minus 0.05%, not the 6% differences they are seeing. Also, if the sunshine reaching some parts of the earth is increasing but it is decreasing over China, it would be hard to blame that on the sun's output. It would have to say, "Oh, it's daytime in China. It's time to get dimmer."
Doomed! We are all Doom!
Absolutely bears repeating.
It is a well established scientific fact that lightbulbs flare several times greater than normal just before they blow
The world will soon turn into a flying piece of ice. Just like Pluto. (and Daffy, of course).
Repent today.
Vote Democrat tomorrow.
Thank you.
"Unless they pile into their Prius rocket ships and go to the Sun to fix it, hhhhhhehehehe...."
I heard they had planned to go at night.
Is this 'global brightening?' -- I'm sure it was no more than a couple of years ago that this same crowd was claiming that the earth was experiencing 'global dimming!' And, of course, whether it is brightening or dimming, warming or cooling, raining or snowing, windy or calm, Algore will be there to explain it all to us.
The sun is actually not significantly brighter. It appears brighter just as sounds appear louder when the person is stressed: anxiety over global warming. It is a maladjustment in bodily chemistry. The cure is to eat less cheese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.