Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buy America, weaken America
usnews ^ | 3/25/06 | Richard J. Newman

Posted on 03/25/2006 8:07:17 PM PST by ncountylee

The Durabrand 10-inch portable DVD player available at Wal-Mart retails for $199.94. A group of senators would like to raise the price to $254.67. The Creative Zen Nano Plus 512-megabyte MP3 player seems like a bargain at $89.72; less so at $114.39, the price the senators would prefer that you pay. The price hikes would be the result of a 27.5 percent tariff on goods imported from China, a proposal sponsored by Democrat Chuck Schumer of New York and Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and is scheduled to come up for a vote in the Senate this week.

Schumer and Graham aren't crazy, of course—they know better than most that taking money out of voters' pockets is a sure way to be sent packing. In other words, that 27.5 percent price hike won't be coming to a retailer near you anytime soon. But as an attention-getter, it's pretty good, and attention is what the two senators, and a number of colleagues who support them, are after. The chief bogeyman they want to flog is China's communist government, which—according to Schumer and the rest—deliberately keeps its currency undervalued in order to sell more cheap imports to the United States and other countries. Reasonable economists differ on that question. The tariff, if you buy the argument, would bring prices on Chinese imports closer to their unsubsidized value, leveling the playing field for honest tradespeople in, say, New York and South Carolina, who can't possibly produce goods as cheaply as the Chinese and still earn enough wages to buy all the DVD and MP players that they need.

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; china; economics; globalization; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-322 next last
To: ncountylee
The Durabrand 10-inch portable DVD player available at Wal-Mart retails for $199.94. A group of senators would like to raise the price to $254.67. The Creative Zen Nano Plus 512-megabyte MP3 player seems like a bargain at $89.72; less so at $114.39,

And even less so at the price it would cost to make here. Face it folks the production is not coming back here unless the cost to make it overseas becomes high enough to justify it. Most consumers will see the price "hike" and shrug it off as typical inflation.

41 posted on 03/25/2006 8:42:13 PM PST by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

Most of the parts they assemble into cars in US factories come from China, Mexico and Canada.
Bought replacement brake parts for my GM car and Jimmy. In big bold black stenciled letters on all the cartons "Made In China". AND I DIDN'T BUY THEM AT WALLY WORLD!!!


42 posted on 03/25/2006 8:42:21 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jec41

GM sells many cars in China and is building more plants in China.. Buick is the biggest seller.

-

GM is being *absorbed* in China.

Foreign companies do not own or produce anything in China. Foreign companies are required to go into business with Chinese partners, transfer production technology, then eventually leave the local factory in Chinese hands.

GM is selling the rope - yes, it's happening - that is very soon likely to send it into bankruptcy.

We need to stop playing make-believe about China. We're never going to sell a billion shoes to a billion Chinese. It didn't happen that way.

What happened, is the Chinese learned to make the shoes, then sold a billion shoes to us.

The same thing will happen with cars. Then with airplanes.

Then what?

When we have lost all capacity to manufacture anything anymore, will we design our armed forces on Lenovo computers????????????????????????


43 posted on 03/25/2006 8:42:54 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
Not always. It could also be a form of patriotism, and to protect fair trade, so that healthy competition will be availible. The value of Yuan is set wrong, and the COMMUNIST China has not changed the value much despite warnings from US. We are facing an unhealthy and unfair trade, benifitting China that fills COMMUNIST China's pocket with money to have them build more advanced military equipments that could threat our country.

Not true, the Yuan was pegged to the American dollar but that ended quite some time ago. It is now based on a basket of currencies and is freely traded. the Yuan is now like the dollar, traders pay what they think is worth.

44 posted on 03/25/2006 8:43:02 PM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
Wow talk about an apples and oranges comparison. Pat Tillman voluntarily gave up his economic advantage of his own free will. God bless him for that.

You're talking about taking away peoples money and choices at the point of a government gun.

That's the difference.

Now how about you try to explain to Pat how you wanted to take one of the freedoms he died to protect.

L

45 posted on 03/25/2006 8:43:14 PM PST by Lurker (I trust in God. Everyone else shows me their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jec41

Well that is what Limbaugh and t he WSJ op ed pages say, but in historical reality, that is far from being the truth. Tariffs are in fact specifically mentioned in the constitution. Tariffs were used in pre FDR America, when the US govrenmnet in terms of economics was libertarian in nature. It is amazing how bankrupt mainstream "conservatism" is now.


46 posted on 03/25/2006 8:43:17 PM PST by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I thought there wasn't much money to be made putting electronic gizmos together, that's why we have them made overseas. (?) Its kind of a goodwill thing. Isn't Korea taking over some of these electronics manufacturing from China (who got it from Japan)?


47 posted on 03/25/2006 8:44:39 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decal

This is not Japan we're discussing.

China is a completely different animal. A rabid animal.


48 posted on 03/25/2006 8:44:41 PM PST by Number57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TBP
We must not fund those who seek to attack us.

Why should they attack us when we're their best customer?

“If goods can't cross borders armies will.”
–Frederic Bastiat

49 posted on 03/25/2006 8:45:03 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I think I was way ahead of my time. In 1966 at UCSB, I had a sign in the window of my room on the 7th floor of San Miguel hall --- BOMB PEKING.


50 posted on 03/25/2006 8:46:48 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decal

Japans problems were due to its corrupt political system, of having one party rule since WWII, with their banks making bad loans that caused its economic system to seize up. On the other hand, Japanese heavy industry still does quite well, just the ability of Japanese banks to provide capital to Japanese industry has been cut off because of the bad loans the banks made, mostly due to real estate deals gone bad.

Also, there was a de facto tariff against Japan thhat dated from 1985, and that was the Plaza accord, that reduce the value of the dollar against the Japanese Yen by almost 50%. From 1985 when the dollar was at almost 200 yen per dollar to 1988, where it went down to 110, the value it dropped was far bigger than any tariffs imposed against Japan in the past. On the other hand, the Chinese gov refuses to do anything to adress the value of the RMB.


51 posted on 03/25/2006 8:48:09 PM PST by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Why should they attack us when we're their best customer?

Becasue they're Communists and thus they seek world domination. They seek to rule the world, every bit as much as the Soviets did. That's why they have nuclear warheads pointed at us right now.

52 posted on 03/25/2006 8:49:04 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Smoot-Hawley Tariff:

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/id/17606.htm


53 posted on 03/25/2006 8:49:21 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TBP
They probably will. We have a stronger economy than they do, and ultimately it will do mor damage to them. I'd be happy to trade with them just like any other country -- when they behave like any other country and stop trying to attakc us militarily and economically.

We still have a larger GDP but their GDP growth rate is three times as much. They also have a 1.3 billion marketplace where we have but 300 million.

54 posted on 03/25/2006 8:49:25 PM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jec41

The Yuan is not free traded.

The exchange rate is very carefully controlled by the government of China. At the moment it is approximately 8.03 to the dollar. That was "freed" from its previous peg among a blizzard of publicity some time ago, but is no more a free exchange rate than it was before.

The only change has been, it is now pegged to a basket of currencies, rather than just the dollar. The Chinese government still decides secretly what the basket is - and changes it very, very, very slowly.

Please stop dreaming about China. Be realistic at least.

We are being played.


55 posted on 03/25/2006 8:49:48 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

You must have pulled a muscle with that stretch.


56 posted on 03/25/2006 8:50:26 PM PST by Choose Ye This Day ("Yo, Mike, you vant us to unpimp zis ting lemme hear you say 'vat.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Number57
And I suppose you drive a Chevy Cobalt? A fine motor car from the granddaddy American manufacturer!

Ronald Reagan on protectionism.

Manufactures and regular American have known of intense competition since Lee Iacocca took to the airwaves to implore us to "Buy American". Sorry, protecting jobs at the expense of the wealth of their countrymen is an European idea, not an American one. Reagan knew that. Too bad too many people who claim to be Conservatives don't.

57 posted on 03/25/2006 8:50:41 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (US Military - Draining the Swamp of Terrorism since 2001!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Why should they attack us when we're their best customer?

Why shouldn't they attack, once they've liberated so much of our wealth through bad politics and lop-sided trade agreements, and they dominate us simply by being the most wealthy nation on the planet? WHO'S TO STOP THEM? Us, with our monumental debt? Or them, with incredible surplus?

Say your prayers, kids.
58 posted on 03/25/2006 8:51:01 PM PST by Number57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Number57
"I wholly agree with the tariffs. We need to keep American products competitive"

I as well. There is no way the American worker can compete with countries such as China. Their labor cost are rock bottom, they provide little if any benefits such as the American worker enjoys.

But what the heck, who needs health care, retirement savings, vacation. The high tech corporation I am employed has frozen wages for years, cut pensions, cut health benefits, and the ol cloud of layoff looms year after year.

We need our congress to help the American worker, restore our manufacturing base and put tariffs on products produced at dirt cheap labor.
59 posted on 03/25/2006 8:51:28 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step

1966 Corvair, when I do drive. Most times I ride my Schwinn.

My ex drives a Windstar. And my other ex drives a Jeep. Thanks for asking.


60 posted on 03/25/2006 8:52:47 PM PST by Number57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson