Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591

Well for your three: tax cuts without spending cuts are worse than no tax cuts as you will be taxed in the future to pay for the spending, and pay interest. The War on Terror might be a good idea but it hasn't been well fought. We don't know what Gore would have done, or Kerry. But what Bush did hasn't worked. We have not created an Islamic Germany, in fact the Moslem world is not much better than it was. Vis: the aposty guy in Afghanistan. And it's only a matter of time till that happens in Iraq too. Yeah, the SC guys are a net plus. But they can't hold back what is coming...


437 posted on 03/26/2006 5:20:38 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black
tax cuts without spending cuts are worse than no tax cuts as you will be taxed in the future to pay for the spending, and pay interest.

Not true. Tax cuts may be paid for with future spending cuts. Further, your analysis is static. You assume tax cuts result in lower revenue. That has not been the case. The tax cuts have produced more revenue, it is just there has been even more spending.

438 posted on 03/26/2006 5:33:40 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson