To: Hildy
Seemingly, your citation of such an extreme example isn't all that far removed from the common tactic of pro-abortionists who habitually come up with a rationale of incestuous rape while conveniently ignoring far more common &, for the most part, irresponsible causes of pregnancy.
My position begins with the ideal insofar as any child's best interests with respect his/her emotional health & physical safety.
Accordingly, children should rightly have - not withstanding valid reasons serving to preclude as much - the closest possible relationships with both their natural & heterosexual mother & father since these are their most appropriate role models for countless reasons in a host of areas.
54 posted on
03/25/2006 6:50:36 PM PST by
GMMAC
(paraphrasing Parrish: "damned Liberals, I hate those bastards!")
To: GMMAC
Seemingly, your citation of such an extreme example isn't all that far removed from the common tactic of pro-abortionists who habitually come up with a rationale of incestuous rape while conveniently ignoring far more common &, for the most part, irresponsible causes of pregnancy.What on earth are you talking about?
My position begins with the ideal insofar as any child's best interests with respect his/her emotional health & physical safety. Accordingly, children should rightly have - not withstanding valid reasons serving to preclude as much - the closest possible relationships with both their natural & heterosexual mother & father since these are their most appropriate role models for countless reasons in a host of areas.
Again, what on earth are you talking about? You asked me about gay adoption. An adoption takes place when the PARENTS DON'T WANT THE CHILD, am I incorrect on that?
I suspect you like to hear yourself talk, because this means nothing in terms of the discussion we were having.
55 posted on
03/25/2006 6:56:19 PM PST by
Hildy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson