I agree. Thanks for the information.
As I recall it, news coverage (on CNBC, at least) didn't switch to a live shot of the WTC until several minutes (possibly as much as 10 minutes) after the first plane had hit. There were a few minutes spent showing the fire in the first tower when the second plane entered the frame and hit the second tower. I'd have to review a timeline to be sure I'm even accurate at that.
I doubt that any other stations were much faster than CNBC was.
Although Sheen is obviously a lunatic, I'd be interested to see if any of you who judge his statements to be so absurd could find any scientifics explanations that account for the data concerning the collapse of the towers:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
(paper by Steven E Jones PhD, Professor of Physics at NYU)