Skip to comments.
Are the neocons losing it? Pat Buchanan
WND ^
| 3-24-2006
| Pat Buchanan
Posted on 03/25/2006 12:38:33 PM PST by rcocean
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-190 next last
To: churchillbuff
...all of whom, if memory serves, have called themselves neo-cons at one time or another.Did they do so with any sense of irony or defiance?
121
posted on
03/25/2006 8:46:21 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Petronski
Did they do so with any sense of irony or defiance?"""
I don't think so. Either Podhoretz or the senior Kristol coined the word -- to describe former Democrats who because Republicans because of defense issues mainly. Neo con meanse "new conservative" -- new type of conservative, basically one who isn't for scaling back the welfare state. That's not my kind of conservative.
To: Petronski
Pat is an American First.
You are the one - on every Buchanan Thread- bringing up Nazi's, German History, Israel, Poland, WW II, the 1930s, and all sorts of things that have nothing to do with the article or the USA Circa 2006.
I have no idea what "Bluton and Blood" is.
Is it Polish ?
123
posted on
03/25/2006 8:49:14 PM PST
by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: rcocean
a no-win war that is bleeding our countryThat could have been written by Michael Moore.
To: rcocean
I have no idea what "Bluton and Blood" is. Is it Polish ? My God, the irony!
125
posted on
03/25/2006 8:51:46 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: rcocean; Darkwolf377; Howlin
Pat is an American First. And what is he now?
126
posted on
03/25/2006 8:53:37 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Petronski
You keep talking about the "JOOOSSS".
Who are you refering to?
127
posted on
03/25/2006 8:54:41 PM PST
by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: Petronski
And what is he now?
Irrelevant.
128
posted on
03/25/2006 8:55:19 PM PST
by
onyx
(Elections are in November, 06 ---- 08 can wait!)
To: duckln
All I said was Christophobic. Oh, is that all you said?
LOL
Do you imagine that would mean I fear Christ, or Christians, or Christianity?
I love a really good slur and I hope you'll finish the job. Don't hold back now.
129
posted on
03/25/2006 8:56:00 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: rcocean
Feigned ignorance does not become you.
130
posted on
03/25/2006 8:56:37 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: onyx
Irrelevant? Good.
Still visible? Not so good.
131
posted on
03/25/2006 8:58:47 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: rcocean
What does Pat do when somebody says something he disagrees with and the AREN'T Jewish? Then what?
132
posted on
03/25/2006 8:59:17 PM PST
by
Cinnamon Girl
(OMGIIHIHOIIC ping list)
To: churchillbuff
Neo-Cons can into existence in the 1980s. They were former liberal democrats of the "Scoop Jackson" type.
They broke with the Democrats over foreign policy. They disliked the Democrat's isolationism, lack of support for Israel, and weak position on Communism and Defense.
Jean Kirkpatrick was a Neo-con and proud of it.
133
posted on
03/25/2006 9:00:26 PM PST
by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: Cinnamon Girl
Then what?I'm not sure, but I suspect he goes back to his lab to continue trying to prove diesel trucks couldn't have been used to gas the enemies of National Socialism.
134
posted on
03/25/2006 9:02:12 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: bkepley
Who was that running mate you chose a few years ago? ROFL! But...but...she was black though! So Pat can't be a racist right?
To: Petronski
Quit playing games.
Are you an anti-semite? Why are you always calling Jews, "JOOOS"?
136
posted on
03/25/2006 9:02:35 PM PST
by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: Petronski
Back to WW II again. Only 60 years ago.
What the War of the Roses? What was Pats position on that conflict?
137
posted on
03/25/2006 9:03:57 PM PST
by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: rcocean
JOOOOOOS is an internet term used to mock anti-Semites who like to blame everything on the Jews. It's meant to be spelled like anti-Semites pronounce the term: in an affected, sinister tone.
138
posted on
03/25/2006 9:05:10 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: rcocean
What the War of the Roses? What was Pats position on that conflict?I have no idea, but if forced to guess, I suspect he blamed it on the Jooooooooooooooos.
139
posted on
03/25/2006 9:06:04 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: rcocean
Oh, and I'm not playing games. You are feigning ignorance in your hope that I will either slip up and give you the moral high ground or somehow succumb to your rhetorical prowess (LOL) and become a xenophobic isolationist anti-Zionist.
140
posted on
03/25/2006 9:08:06 PM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson