[summer]

On the other hand, if it was a set-up, you wouldn't know it right now.

And, if it wasn't, and if he is guilty, then, yes, I agree with you.

[inkling]

But why would the WaPo invent a conspiracy that made them look as bad as this wet-behind-the-ears blogger? WaPo tried to do a good thing by hiring a con and it bit them badly. The plagiarist also damaged National Review since that's where some of his stolen work appeared.

We all know that WaPo is on the left, but at least they attempt the occasional balancing effort. NYT sure doesn't feature George Will and Charles Krauthammer on their op-ed page like WaPo does.