In the absence of any evidence, I prefer to wait and see.
At this point, just about any reason is as plausable as any other. I am firmly in favor of removing child molesters from the gene pool, but as a man with a daughter I resent the assumption that he is one because his sweet looking wife killed him.
Many, many years ago I got pretty involved with an attractive woman that did a very good job of hiding the fact that she was wacko. As a matter of fact, years later she ruined her ex husband (along with his wife's career as a teacher) by painting him as a child molester. Which was later proved to be completely false. Much too late for him.
Wait and see how this plays out.
How rare!