Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slain Minister's Wife to Be Charged With Murder
Fox News ^ | March 24, 2006

Posted on 03/24/2006 8:28:46 AM PST by Blogger

Slain Minister's Wife to Be Charged With Murder Friday, March 24, 2006 MEMPHIS, Tenn. — The wife of a Tennessee pastor found shot dead in his house Wednesday will face first-degree murder charges, authorities announced Friday.

Mary Winklerwas found Thursday night with the couple's three daughters in Orange Beach, Ala., about 400 miles south of their home in Selmer.

Investigators with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation said she was interviewed during the night and the charges were being prepared.

"We've interviewed her and she was cooperative," said Jennifer Johnson of the TBI, adding that once a warrant with the charges was drawn up, extradition proceedings would begin to have her returned to Tennessee.

Matthew Winkler was found shot to death in the bedroom of his parsonage Wednesday by church members who began searching for him after he failed to show up at an evening event at Selmer's Church of Christ.

Police said there were no signs of forced entry, but Winkler's wife and children — Breanna, 1; Mary Alice, 6; and Patricia, 8 — were gone.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: banglist; churchofchrist; deathcultivation; homicide; marywinkler; matthewwinkler; minister; pastor; tennessee; winkler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,061-1,076 next last
To: Sloth
Not necessarily. If I was going to beat my wife, I might very well want to avoid bruising her in visible areas, i.e., nothing to stop me from punching her in the gut or kidneys instead. Her lack of a black eye does not mean she hasn't been physically abused.

Covered by my point of her not being taken to a hospital for medical attention. If the police are aware that a person in custody has any physical harm to their body, they seek out medical treatment for the person.

First, if they do not, it becomes fodder for a defense attorney. "the poor abused women, beat by her husband and kept from getting medical help by the police" type scenario.

Secondly the police want proof that any injury did not occur because of the arrest or questioning process. Medical exams are used to show the injuries happened before the person was in custody. It's to cover LEO's rear ends from abuse allegations.
281 posted on 03/24/2006 12:56:37 PM PST by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Hmmm. Maybe I missed something. Is there anything to this story that would lead anyone to believe he was molesting her children? And if he were does that justify shooting him ... and in the back?! I remember reading about these organizations used in most civilized societies. They are called the "police" and the "legal system". And you know what? It's THIER JOB to arrest and prosecute criminals, but only after what they call a "fair trial". I would want to shoot someone who molested my kid, but I don't think I would actually do it. Shooting someone is justified only in self-defense. Anything else is vigilante ism. And makes us no better than the Muslims.
282 posted on 03/24/2006 12:58:47 PM PST by manwiththehands (Islam is as Islam does. Islam is as Islam allows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
She is the product of an environment that teaches people to justify their own actions as being righteous while condemning others.

So youre one of the "once saved always saved-speaking-in-tongues" denominations eh?

283 posted on 03/24/2006 12:58:54 PM PST by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

So, what your saying is that sin can infest any environment.
That's all you are saying.


284 posted on 03/24/2006 1:00:03 PM PST by sonserae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

It's obviously pre-meditate if she rented a condo...she had to plan ahead to rent it. It wasn't a "heat of the moment" kind of thing.


285 posted on 03/24/2006 1:01:15 PM PST by sonserae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs

>Shot in the back, not even a fair fight.<

Perhaps making up for previous "unfair fights".


286 posted on 03/24/2006 1:06:21 PM PST by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Windsong

Wrong again.


287 posted on 03/24/2006 1:10:39 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: sonserae

"So, what your saying is that sin can infest any environment. That's all you are saying."

Nooooo.

I said, "She is the product of an environment that teaches people to justify their own actions as being righteous while condemning others. That is the root of it, IMO."


288 posted on 03/24/2006 1:13:18 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

"It would be nice to have at least a fact or two to back up your condemnation of an entire church."

I didn't 'condemn an entire church'. If anyone did, you did.

I said, "She is the product of an environment that teaches people to justify their own actions as being righteous while condemning others. That is the root of it, IMO."

IMO, she is a product of that environment. If you think that environment is consistent for all CoC's, then you are condemning an entire church, not me.

Please try to respond rationally rather than emotionally. The emotional approach is probably how the husband-killer reacted.


289 posted on 03/24/2006 1:17:03 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

So, you are okay with justifying your actions of generalizing that everyone in a group justifies their sin?

I think you might want to start saying less as God is also judging your judgemental attitude.


290 posted on 03/24/2006 1:18:19 PM PST by sonserae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: sonserae

"I think you might want to start saying less as God is also judging your judgemental attitude."

Isn't that being just a little bit..... judgemental? ;-)


291 posted on 03/24/2006 1:22:15 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Hey smart guy, a capella singing is music.

And CoC ain't a cult, not even close.


292 posted on 03/24/2006 1:22:30 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Are you saying that you are familiar with the congregations she has attended?


293 posted on 03/24/2006 1:22:42 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Brytani
Covered by my point of her not being taken to a hospital for medical attention.

Ahh, point taken. Well, it doesn't rule out having been beaten in the past, but I'll agree that it suggests she'd received no such physical abuse recently.

294 posted on 03/24/2006 1:23:31 PM PST by Sloth (Archaeologists test for intelligent design all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

I didn't SAY he was molesting them. Did you see the "I"?

I was agreeing with you that in most cases a trip to the police is the answer.

If *I* CAUGHT someone molesting one of my children, I might just kill him. That WOULD be defending my child from an attack, which is covered under self-defense laws.


295 posted on 03/24/2006 1:23:46 PM PST by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Please add me to your pinglist.


296 posted on 03/24/2006 1:25:22 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

I don't consider it rational to make "factual" statements about a church you haven't attended.


297 posted on 03/24/2006 1:26:24 PM PST by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Not judgemental, just observant. You know nothing about this woman you are judging...what she's thinking, what happened at church, her motives, etc. Your writings are evidence of your judgemental attitude. I'm just stating an observance.


298 posted on 03/24/2006 1:29:04 PM PST by sonserae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

OK, I will translate for for you.

All the CoC girls would go to different churches so that they could have instrumental music at their weddings.

What a testament to their religion. The most important covenant short of salvation itself was done in another church so that they could do it 'their way'.

That's the point. Justifying whatever you want to do when it contradicts 'the church'.

I believe that's essentially what Miss Husband-Killer did, isn't it?


299 posted on 03/24/2006 1:29:35 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

I thought I was extremely clear that it was consistent with the congregations I did attend.

Recognized it instantly.


300 posted on 03/24/2006 1:30:26 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,061-1,076 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson