[wotan]

I have been reading about the Trilateral Commission "banking conspiracy" for years. The primary proponent of this theory once was a group called "Liberty Lobby" that had some anti-semitic inclinations. The Trilateral Commission was almost a code for the Rothchild banker (Jewish) conspiracy. The theory is that Trilats want to create a one world government controlled by bankers. People across the political spectrum, in theory are on the same page to give up our sovereignty to others, for what, money??

Who cares? Just read the article. What purported facts are wrong? What opinions do you find unsubstantiated, etc.? What facts do you want to add? What opinions do you have and why?

It has become far too common for people to be smeared as "anti-Semites" for having a theory that others don't like.

I posted this article because I question the notion that "interdependence" is a good thing. The article points out some troubling consequences for national security.

To the extent that "free trade" creates interdependence, it should be questioned, too. It would be one thing to be buying decorative pillows from Colombia. It would be an entirely different matter to be developing new military technology based on chips manufactured only in the PRC, strategic materials available only from South Africa, etc.

You find "walls" everywhere in nature. Why do you suppose that is? Would you want your cell walls dissolved so all your protoplasm could freely exchange organic chemicals with one another?

[hedgetrimmer]

There is nothing good for the American people in the notion of interdependence. The revolutionary war was fought to establish independence and rebuke the "free trade" system Britain had foisted on the world. They are at it again, this time more successfully, because the last 50 years has been spent breeding the INDEPENDENCE out of our government and of the American people.