Posted on 03/22/2006 8:58:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Edited on 03/23/2006 2:06:21 AM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
Might try reading the news before making dumb posts.
"The bastards can regulate speech here but not world wide yet."
Why would you want to run and hide in another country?
I say face the bastards right here, face to face.
If we don't win in the courts or Congress, we can win at the polls.
Shaz
you have to get the message out to win at the polls
look at the web sites that beam the truth into other represive countries they are the life blood of the resistance
I think that's exactly where they are heading. She has said so herself on more than one occasion.
And how many Republicans do you think will EVER be elected again?
And if she had been around in the late 1930's, she would have been an usher at a Bund Meeting and donated $25 to a Martin Bormann Telethon.
She has had her thesis at Wellsley on Saul Alinksy and Marxism SEALED. Barbara Olsen was trying to get ahold of a copy. She didn't live long enough to succeed.
Those sealed papers are radio-active.
Apart from my faith in God, despair would be an easy temptation, trap.
I increasingly am finding myself convinced that most of the political scene is charade by the puppet masters distracting while they tighten the noose and ramp up their terrorizing toward scaring the world's citizens into the global government.
I realize it's destined. But woe to the complicit buggers who aid and abet it.
I sure want to stand up and be counted in behalf of the Constitution and our cherished freedoms as long as possible.
I'd vote for McCain over Shrillery, too--but with a clothespin on my nose.
I think he's funded and supported and ordered by more or less the same puppet masters as she is. She's just sold out to them heart and soul. And, she likely fancies herself with stars in her eyes as sleeping with the devil himself.
McCain strikes me more as a complicit opportunist floating along the road of least resistence and being traitorously stupid in the process.
But, I've been wrong a number of times before . . .
Much appreciate your kind reply. Heading off to class.
Wow! I hadn't heard about that thesis. Interesting. I wish someone would forego that endeavour that BKO was trying to bring to light, as a legacy to BKO.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600831/posts
The lady who lit the crowd at the town hall yesterday is going to be on Cavuto today. The one who spoke passionately about the service of her husband and talked about DVD's she has, and her anger toward the left-winged media.
Let's ping her and ask for help/guidance.
I think she addresses it in her final book "Hell To Pay."
If McCain runs as the presidential candidate, I see my options as: 1) vote Constitutional party, 2) stay home, 3) vote for the non-Hillary middle-of-road Democrat.
Roger that.
Both houses of Congress promise to return to this topic with a narrower exemption for bloggers, and the blogosphere will welcome that. It still doesn't address the real defect of the BCRA, though, which regulates political speech by treating it as a purchasable commodity. The First Amendment specifically protected the free exercise of political speech, and yet under the BCRA the First Amendment now offers more protection to nude dancing and pornography than it does to political candidates who want to communicate with prospective constituents. Somehow, I don't think it takes an originalist to understand just how wrong that result is. UPDATE: In the interest of cleaning our own house, here are the Republicans who voted against the bill: Boehlert.........Hobson.........Platts.........Upton Bradley (NH).....Johnson (CT)...Ramstad........Walden (OR) Castle...........Johnson (IL)...Regula.........Walsh Coble............Kirk...........Saxton.........Wamp Emerson..........LaHood.........Schmidt........Weldon (PA) Frelinghuysen....LaTourette.....Schwarz........Wilson (NM) Gallegly.........Leach..........Shays..........Wolf Gilchrest........LoBiondo.......Simmons........Bass Gillmor..........Osborne........Smith (NJ)..... Hefley...........Petri..........Turner.........
OH and by the way? - - don't think that there arent plenty of conservatives who are PO'd at Bush - his choice of battles to fight where vetos are concerned are troubling enough (Meiers, Dubai etc), and his LACK of fight concerning this abrogation of the First Amendment says some nasty things about an otherwise good President. HOWEVER - the bill has MCCAIN's and FEINGOLD's name on it - NOT BUSH'S!!! - and so the sh*t hits THEIR fan - if they can't take the heat their tag to this outrage of marxism, then THEY should leave the kitchen - along with all their groupies.
He swore an oath to uphold the Contitution when he was a soldier - he did so as a Senator. What he has done as a Senator however, has just wiped out whatever credibility he held as a soldier by pushing through a bill that cripples the first and foremost of our Constitution. If THAT doesnt make him a traitor, then I dont know what does.
As far as I am concerned, he can no longer claim the title of "veteran" with all the honor it deserves. He is an f'ing traitor. end of story.
Ronnie and I used to ping her alot. We believe she was here.
So, good try, but semantics does not win in this game. McCain/Feingold, as well as the fascists after which it is named, has to go because of its very real threat to my free speech.
*lighting a candle to BKO*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.