Skip to comments.
Officials Map Out Test Milestones for Airborne Laser
Space.com ^
| March 22nd, 2006
| Jeremy Singer
Posted on 03/22/2006 11:26:39 AM PST by Termite_Commander
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: null and void
Clever! Zap-ping, zap-powie!
21
posted on
03/22/2006 12:12:30 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Democracy is a horribly inefficient form of government which tends to drift in the right direction.)
To: Parmenio
That's why there are escorts.
22
posted on
03/22/2006 12:16:27 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Democracy is a horribly inefficient form of government which tends to drift in the right direction.)
To: JeffersonRepublic.com
Maybe something a little less expensive and more disposable?
23
posted on
03/22/2006 12:19:02 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Democracy is a horribly inefficient form of government which tends to drift in the right direction.)
To: Bigs from Michigan
"doing it on a moving NKC-135, the test can be repeated many times."
OK, but doens't a missile move slightly faster than a KC-135?
24
posted on
03/22/2006 12:19:21 PM PST
by
Flightdeck
(Longhorns+January=Rose Bowl Repeat)
To: Flightdeck
They're testing the adaptive optics and atmospheric correction system. For initial tests, getting lots of data in a variety of conditions would seem more important (to me) than getting the data from a fast-moving target.
25
posted on
03/22/2006 12:21:54 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: JeffersonRepublic.com
""How did they plan to protect the 747? The way the article desribes it it would seem difficult to protect the plane against air to air or gound to air missle attack." Distance and Airpower. F-22 maybe?"
The aircraft is designed to destroy missiles with a laser. It can defend itself.
26
posted on
03/22/2006 12:27:21 PM PST
by
SENTINEL
(USMC GWI (MY GOD IS GOD, ROCKCHUCKER !!))
To: Flightdeck
Speed is not an issue at all, for a laser guiding system. It can turn the mirros fast enough to sweep a path from the north star to the moon in a heartbeat. If you took a hand mirror and reflected the light to the east, and then to the west, how fast would it take you?
What is hard is to predict what atmospheric distortion and diffusion will do to a high powered pulse.
Basically, atmospheric conditions distort and diffuse the path of all electro magnetic energy, including light, and lasers.
Laser energy will be bent, and diffused, traveling through the atmosphere. Bending and diffusion are seperate problems. Bending is a twisted path, which changes with energy (due to the interaction with interveneing particles--air). Diffusion is the scattering of the beam, like a spray, also due to interaction with particles.
I think that what you do is measure the bending atmospheric distortion with one laser, use another to blow a hole through it (getting rid of the diffusion), and then use the main one to travel down the atmospheric hole with a mighty pulse.
Measure the path, open the path, send the big kahuna down the path.
Then again, what do I know.
27
posted on
03/22/2006 12:37:05 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: Termite_Commander
What with birdstrikes, hail, and insects, you have to question the wisdom of putting that turret in the nose as opposed to the tail.
28
posted on
03/22/2006 12:40:14 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: JeffersonRepublic.com
"How did they plan to protect the 747?"
Make it a stealth 747.
29
posted on
03/22/2006 12:40:49 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(To Serve Man......It's a cookbook!)
To: Parmenio
How did they plan to protect the 747? It's probably equiped with IRCM systems. Infrared Counter Measures. All Israili commercial jets have them, but they are expensive.
30
posted on
03/22/2006 12:43:56 PM PST
by
subterfuge
("We're going to take things from you for the greater good..."---Hillary Rod-Ham Clinton)
To: Termite_Commander
I wonder what an ABL could do fighters? Could it knock 'em down beyond missile range or would the atmosphere attenuate the beam too much?
31
posted on
03/22/2006 12:48:01 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Termite_Commander; All
32
posted on
03/22/2006 1:11:54 PM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: subterfuge
And a fighter escort...similar to a JSTARS aircraft. Typical a flight of F-16s babysit such aircraft while in the air.
33
posted on
03/22/2006 1:14:41 PM PST
by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: backhoe
Thank you for the reference!
34
posted on
03/22/2006 1:16:30 PM PST
by
phantomworker
(Democracy is a horribly inefficient form of government which tends to drift in the right direction.)
To: archy; Jeff Head
Ping!
35
posted on
03/22/2006 1:26:25 PM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: phantomworker
Thanks for looking- I am hoping there's a lot going on behind the scenes that is not mentioned.
36
posted on
03/22/2006 1:37:30 PM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: Parmenio
Uh...if it can shoot down ICBM's in boost phase at long range, my guess is it could protect itself to some degree and engage a flight of adversarial aircraft well before they could engage it.
Having said that, I would also guess that due to the cost and value of this platform, that they would have some F-22's nearby escorting this aircraft and probably have a tanker in support to ensure they had the "legs" to do the job as long as it was on station.
37
posted on
03/22/2006 1:37:35 PM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Yo-Yo
What with birdstrikes, hail, and insects, you have to question the wisdom of putting that turret in the nose as opposed to the tail. I doubt any of those are a factor at the altitudes at which this turret will be exposed to the outside world. Plus, at the tail you have turbulence and engine heat to mess up the view.
38
posted on
03/22/2006 1:44:08 PM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Hank Rearden
I've worked on Pave Tack FLIR pods for F-111s. Those pods rotated completely inside of the F-111's bomb bay when not in use, and the lens pointed straight up when in standby, and you'd be amazed at how many dings it still ended up getting in it.
I realize the pod will rotate 180 degrees when not in use, but it's still right there out front like any other radome waiting for hail or birdstrike damage.
39
posted on
03/22/2006 2:10:35 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Yo-Yo
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines...
40
posted on
03/22/2006 2:20:00 PM PST
by
null and void
(Perhaps hating America is for those for whom hating Jews just isn't enough. - Philippe Roger)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson