Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OklaRancher
Glad you checked in, OklaRancher. Hearing from someone who was there and confirms the story is true as reported gives me a little confidence in the news media. Why in the world did the judge suspend the sentence? Any thoughts or theories?

what kind of society have we become? That is a question we should all ponder.

52 posted on 03/22/2006 7:42:40 PM PST by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Don Carlos

I'm sure Judge Sellers decision is based on the lack of physical evidence and no abrasions or tearing of the girl.....Was not conventional sex.......However he had the girl shower immediately...she didn't report it for 3 days or more so he had ample time to wash his sheets etc. We heard the nurses testimony and the defense tried to make a big deal of the girl being in a good mood and happy at the exam.....Jeez shes 13 years old, been thru hell...I'm sure her emotions swung back and forth many times a day.....Had the nurse been there to testify in person the verdict would have been the same.....I may call the Judge in a few days as he stated the jurors can call him if they want to.


55 posted on 03/22/2006 8:46:34 PM PST by OklaRancher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson