That asked, and aside from the answers, considering the gross difference between what the jury recommended and the judge's actions, I'd say this is a judge that should be impeached, ASAP.
The story alludes to a witness that wasn't allowed to testify. Also a lawyer - not connected to the case, who alludes to a bad verdict. Hadn't heard about this till this mornings paper arrived.
That said, there is always the possibility that the full story isn't what the article reported. Stay tuned ...