[LexBaird]

Motives and interpretations could be imputed [like they used to be in the cases of "anti-soviet propaganda"], and it is not a route any self-respecting human ought to take. The only way to consider it is on merits, aside of what one could think of "motivations" etc.

If one does not take into account another's motives in evaluating their writings, he runs the grave risk of being used as a tool. A person can always manipulate the information and the most effective way of lying is to publish only the favorable truths to support his position.

Critical thinking should always examine the motives. It is the only defense against spin.

[GSlob]

Works both ways, doesn't it?