Which raises another question: Do you believe those without children should be paying taxes to support pub ed?
Well I don't think you could make an exception there. Then you'd have people who don't drive not wanting to pay taxes for roads, etc. Kind of a stretch, but I don't think it would work to try to parse things out like that.
"And since you agree that "Parents should be doing this job" then pub education should not be subsidized. I'm all for vouchers. You too?"
Hell YEAH!
See, "pub ed" like ... "pub housing"... "pub medical" clinics MEANS something. It sure doesn't mean the thing is free. Or a PRIVATE institution. Any organization or institution taking ONE PENNY of federal dollars (in this case schools), you end up inviting Fed law INTO the situation. Therefore, it is NOT at all out of line for the Feds to be doing drug testing. They do the same at a number of "public" institutions. I don't get why the pro-drug people don't get this.