Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County suffers rare population exodus (San Diego County)
Sign On San Diego ^ | 3/17/06 | Lori Weisberg

Posted on 03/17/2006 5:07:37 PM PST by BurbankKarl

For the first time in more than three decades, the population of San Diego County declined last year, joining other California coastal counties that are losing their allure as high housing prices drive home-buyers to more affordable regions.

The surprising reversal of the county's long-standing population gains is revealed in U.S. Census Bureau estimates released today showing thousands more people leaving the county than moving in from other parts of the state and elsewhere.

While the county's overall loss of population was 1,728 between July 2004 and July 2005, the more telling number is the net exodus of 43,126 people, many of them who likely headed up Interstate 15 to Riverside County, where housing prices are still considerably lower than in San Diego.

“This is pretty stunning,” said demographer Ed Schafer of the San Diego County Association of Governments. “The net out-migration (domestically) is so powerfully high. That's the story. Riverside (County) is just the opposite. Here you have the coastal counties with all these people leaving them but the counties just to the interior have all these people moving in.”

--

The Census Bureau said San Diego County's population was 2,933,462 as of July 1.

Santa Barbara and Ventura counties and several coastal counties in Northern California also had population declines last year.

People also moved out of Los Angeles and Orange counties, but the two counties were able to muster modest population increases.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: census; exodus; sandiego
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2006 5:07:40 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

I am sure all those newborns will be happy to pay off the SD pension debacle.

2 posted on 03/17/2006 5:08:43 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

ping


3 posted on 03/17/2006 5:08:56 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
"For the first time in more than three decades, the population of San Diego County declined last year, joining other California coastal counties that are losing their allure as high housing prices drive home-buyers to more affordable regions."

That is what is supposed to happen when prices for a commodity get too high - people substitute and that lowers demand somewhat... if the government doesn't jump in to screw it up.
4 posted on 03/17/2006 5:10:52 PM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
When it comes to cooking the books, San Diego's government hacks are gourmet chefs.

It's too bad. San Diego has traditionally been a bedrock of Republicanism and conservatism in Southern California and is a beautiful place to live besides.

5 posted on 03/17/2006 5:12:18 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (A fool and his money are soon parted. Democrats love fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

"the more telling number is the net exodus of 43,126 people"

Illegals picked up the slack and SD came out almost even except for the giant increase in welfare and free medical that they brought with them.


6 posted on 03/17/2006 5:12:42 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl; Brad's Gramma

Good news - more room for illegal immigrants, soon to be American citizens : )


7 posted on 03/17/2006 5:13:06 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

There ya go! Thanks!


8 posted on 03/17/2006 5:13:23 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

WHOO HOOOOOOOO!!!!


9 posted on 03/17/2006 5:14:05 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl


LOL! Massachusetts has experienced a drop in population, seems many many people are exiting this State, can't imagine why, Tom Reilly, taxes out the kazoo, illegals getting away with murder literally among other crimes, did I mention taxes out the kazooooooo, a legislature that is clueless, did I mention taxes????


10 posted on 03/17/2006 5:18:24 PM PST by rockabyebaby (I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Are you sure this "net" figure does not factor in illegal immigrants?


11 posted on 03/17/2006 5:19:24 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

You've been following developments in Congress too?


12 posted on 03/17/2006 5:20:19 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

Read it again, that's what I just said.


13 posted on 03/17/2006 5:22:37 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

California has been losing 250,000 California born residents a year for a while now....but they are more than replaced by immigration, legal and illegal, from Asia and points south....and their newborns.


14 posted on 03/17/2006 5:23:48 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

What say ye, Travis?


15 posted on 03/17/2006 5:32:50 PM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Oh, O.K. "43,126 people" didn't sound like "almost even" to me.


16 posted on 03/17/2006 5:37:14 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

What, again, is the difference between "250,000 California born residents" and "newborns" born in the State of California and therefore also U.S. citizens?


17 posted on 03/17/2006 5:38:31 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

43k moved out but the net population loss was only 1,700, illegals made up the 41k difference,

Taxpayers left, tax users arrived.


18 posted on 03/17/2006 5:51:40 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Drive safely on your way out.

19 posted on 03/17/2006 6:24:43 PM PST by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

will we see some new congressional districts in four years - with two or three more inland congressmen?


20 posted on 03/17/2006 6:36:15 PM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson