Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big new reservoir of water ice suspected under Mars - It once SNOWED on Mars
newscientistspace ^ | 16 March 2006 | Maggie McKee

Posted on 03/17/2006 6:52:12 AM PST by S0122017

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: doc30
The atmosphere protects us from some types of radiation, and the magfield protects us from other types, as well as protecting the atmosphere from the direct solar wind. Its all part of the very unique system that we have here on Earth.

Your temperature comments are also relevant, as well.
21 posted on 03/17/2006 10:48:16 AM PST by Magnum44 (Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
Until the ice is confirmed by a lander with a drill that can bring up a core sample, the evidence, in particular the exact location of accessible water, is not sufficient to send anything but a completely self-sufficient manned landing that will return after a short stay. This is highly inefficient, but is the status of the Mars landing mission now.

A better program for long-term manned exploration would create a permanent space station orbiting Mars that could send down any number of robot landers and eventually a manned lander, and after a while a permanent surface base.

22 posted on 03/17/2006 10:54:29 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
Terraforming can start right away! It gives you an idea of what the possibility of (former) life on mars are, if the average climate there used to be warmer.
The climate didn't used to be warmer, there's just some water there. :')

Due to the wisp of an atmosphere (it's about the same atmospheric pressure as at 40 miles altitude on Earth) the only way to have flowing water is for some heat source (such as the energy from an impact from space) to sublime the ice directly into vapor, which would provide a temporary atmosphere and microclimate, permitting liquid water to flow. That's consistent with what is seen on the surface -- erosion from streams that appeared from nowhere, flowed to nowhere, and went away to nowhere.
23 posted on 03/19/2006 8:58:35 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

"If they are actually water ice, they may shed light on the planet's past climate. The polar ice caps themselves are made of icy layers that researchers believe were laid down as snow during periodic swings in the planet's tilt – and therefore its climate – every 50,000 years. Plaut says studying the shape and thickness of the layers could reveal more about the nature of these climatic shifts."
End quote article.


24 posted on 03/20/2006 3:56:05 AM PST by S0122017 (PingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

"If they are actually water ice, they may shed light on the planet's past climate. The polar ice caps themselves are made of icy layers that researchers believe were laid down as snow during periodic swings in the planet's tilt – and therefore its climate – every 50,000 years. Plaut says studying the shape and thickness of the layers could reveal more about the nature of these climatic shifts."
End quote article.


25 posted on 03/20/2006 3:56:06 AM PST by S0122017 (PingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPingniPing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
The polar ice caps themselves are made of icy layers that researchers believe were laid down as snow during periodic swings in the planet's tilt – and therefore its climate – every 50,000 years.
They can believe whatever they want, but there's nothing to substantiate that belief; whereas impacts on Mars are everywhere in evidence.
26 posted on 03/20/2006 9:12:38 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

But youre hypothesis is, that meteors strike, melt water which erodes the surface? There are huge canal-like structures on mars, but i thought they where not made by water. Also, you are presuming there is water everywhere where a meteor strikes. And if a meteor where to hit ice-deposits, it would vaporize it, not melt it to a river :)
You should try to drop an icecube on a plate of a few hundred degree Celsius. More spectacular then fireworks!


27 posted on 03/20/2006 10:13:33 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
Humans have always been suckers for a good story..
even for bad ones.. Not all humans have good taste in literature..
28 posted on 03/20/2006 10:19:54 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
There are huge canal-like structures on mars, but i thought they where not made by water.
There are no "huge canal-like structures on mars". There are however erosional features.
Also, you are presuming there is water everywhere where a meteor strikes.
Nowhere have I ever presumed that. Instead, you appear to be engaging in a straw man argument.
And if a meteor where to hit ice-deposits, it would vaporize it, not melt it to a river :)
Any energy raising the water ice on Mars to the melting point vaporizes it. The heating of the soil (as I wrote above) turns some of the ice to vapor, producing a temporary atmosphere in a limited area; this permits more of the water ice to melt into water, because there is sufficient atmospheric pressure.
You should try to drop an icecube on a plate of a few hundred degree Celsius. More spectacular then fireworks!
And that has exactly nothing to do with anything discussed here.
29 posted on 03/20/2006 10:45:05 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

You sure know how to be defensive in a discussion.
Those "erosional features" could not have arisen from the occasional rain. Some are deeper then the grand canyon.

Sure, there are no roots to hold soil together, but any comet-vapor-rain event would not occur every other day now, would it? We have been watching mars for a short while now and i haven't heard of it.


30 posted on 03/20/2006 10:51:20 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

Sprinkle of white on the red planet
arizonarepublic | February, 23 2003
Posted on 02/23/2003 6:56:45 PM EST by Indy Pendance
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/850178/posts


31 posted on 03/20/2006 10:52:37 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That doesn't say the comet caused the snow, or that the comet caused huge rainstorms with erode the surface.


32 posted on 03/20/2006 11:02:17 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
You sure know how to be defensive in a discussion.
I sure know how to discuss things, if that's what you mean.
Those "erosional features" could not have arisen from the occasional rain. Some are deeper then the grand canyon.
Again, a straw man argument.
Sure, there are no roots to hold soil together, but any comet-vapor-rain event would not occur every other day now, would it? We have been watching mars for a short while now and i haven't heard of it.
Mars is covered with craters, and those were caused by impacts.

Water erosional features have been seen on Mars. I'm a little surprised that you'd oppose that concept, since you think snow used to fall on Mars, and snow is made of water.

Mars' mass and density are such that its atmosphere is today about what it has been for a very very long time (not a mere 50,000 years, but millions of them), and liquid water can't exist on Mars because of the low atmospheric pressure.

Any purported snowfall on Mars would itself have to result from the impact scenario -- the vapor would lose energy some time after and distance from the impact, refreeze, and precipitate.

The seasonal growth and shrinkage of the polar icecaps would be due to the arrival of solar radiation or lack thereof. But it doesn't mean Mars can be terraformed.
33 posted on 03/20/2006 11:05:22 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Water erosional features have been seen on Mars. I'm a little surprised that you'd oppose that concept, since you think snow used to fall on Mars, and snow is made of water. When did i oppose that concept? I only disagree on the origin of the flowing water.

Mars' mass and density are such that its atmosphere is today about what it has been for a very very long time (not a mere 50,000 years, but millions of them), and liquid water can't exist on Mars because of the low atmospheric pressure.

Apparently it can exist after a comet impact. Why does the vapor not just float to space?

Any purported snowfall on Mars would itself have to result from the impact scenario -- the vapor would lose energy some time after and distance from the impact, refreeze, and precipitate. Some snow does not carve out ravines deeper then the grand canyon. Nor does the occasional rainfall resulting from the occasional meteor impact.

The seasonal growth and shrinkage of the polar icecaps would be due to the arrival of solar radiation or lack thereof. But it doesn't mean Mars can be terraformed. It still resembles earth more then any other planet in our solarsystem. It is supposedly too small to hold an atmosphere, but astronomy changes it's theories to fast to convince me yet, that Mars always was a dead world. Im not talking about jungles, just an active climate system.
34 posted on 03/20/2006 11:18:50 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Climate on Mars
Mars is a cold, forbidding planet. Although Mars is not much further from the Sun than Earth is, Mars has only a thin atmosphere, so the solar energy that reaches Mars' surface is reflected back into space without warming the surface. Earth, by contrast, has a layer of greenhouse gases in its atmosphere which absorbs the radiation reflected by Earth and reradiates some of it back to warm the surface.

Evidence from the surface of Mars collected from the Mars and Viking orbiters indicates that Mars was once warm enough to have liquid water on its surface. There is evidence on the Martian surface of ravines and other signs of erosion by water; scientists do not know how long liquid water was present, but they believe that surface water existed on Mars around 4 billion years ago. If water existed on the surface of Mars, then at some in the past Mars must have had an atmosphere warm and dense enough to sustain water in its liquid state. If Mars had enough water for a long enough period of time to cause visible erosion on its surface, then Mars had atmospheric temperatures and pressures similar to those found on Earth.

The prevailing theory is the carbon dioxide in Mars' atmosphere dissolved into its surface water and was ultimately deposited on Mars' surface as solid carbonate rock. This same process occurs on Earth. The carbon stored in Earth's crust is eventually recycled back to the surface over many millions of years when it is emitted through volcanic eruptions. However, unlike Earth, Mars' hot, molten interior cooled and its volcanic activity ceased. Carbon was removed from the atmosphere by Mars' water, but planetary carbon was no longer recycled back to the atmosphere. Mars' greenhouse mechanism weakened and the water on its surface froze or escaped into space.

Mars Weather and Climate Today
The difference in climate between Mars and Earth can help us understand the processes that shape Earth's weather and climate. Mars experiences drastic changes in temperature and violent weather phenomena such as planet-wide sandstorms. Scientists attribute this weather volatility to the lack of water on the planet. Earth's oceans absorb and store vast quantities of heat energy; the oceans remove heat from the atmosphere and, in effect, ration it back out slowly and redistribute it around the globe. Earth's atmosphere also moderates temperatures because its greenhouse gases absorb and reradiate heat back to the planet's surface. Both of these natural processes moderate temperature fluctuations. On Mars, however, with no water or atmosphere to store solar heat, the Sun's energy is absorbed only briefly by the dry, cold surface. Dry land both heats up and cools down much more quickly than water does. Therefore, the surface temperatures on Mars vary drastically from day to night.

Another feature of Mars' climate that affects it on seasonal time scales is that the tilt of its axis can be much greater than Earth's (23.5°), which results in much larger weather contrasts between its northern and southern hemispheres and within each hemisphere from season to season. At present, Mars' axial tilt of 25.2° is almost the same as Earth's, but this angle does not remain constant. Earth's axial tilt undergoes small changes (from 21.5° to 24.5°), but Mars' axial tilt changes significantly, ranging from 15° to 35° over 100,000 years. The difference stems from the fact that Earth has a moon whose gravitational pull stabilizes its orbit. Mars has two small moons with negligible gravity; without greater gravitational pull from its moons to stabilize it, Mars' orbit sways wildly in space. During periods in which Mars' axis is significantly tilted, seasonal changes in incoming sunlight for each hemisphere are drastic.

Mars' elliptical orbit also means that Mars is much closer to the sun at some times of the year and much farther away at others. This means that while Mars has seasons similar to those on Earth, they are about twice as long.

http://www.bonus.com/bonus/nav/scooter/scooterize.htmp?loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ebonus%2Ecom%2Fcontour%2FEnv%5FLit%2Fhttp%40%40%2Fwww%2Eenviroliteracy%2Eorg%2Farticle%2Ephp%2F712%2Ehtml&useragent=Mozilla%2F4%2E0+%28compatible%3B+MSIE+6%2E0%3B+Windows+NT+5%2E1%3B+%2ENET+CLR+1%2E0%2E3705%3B+%2ENET+CLR+1%2E1%2E4322%29&refv=1&referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ealtavista%2Ecom%2Fweb%2Fresults%3Fitag%3Dody%26q%3Dcause%2Bravines%2Bon%2Bmars%26kgs%3D0%26kls%3D0&entry=bonus&SERVER=www%2Ebonus%2Ecom


35 posted on 03/20/2006 11:26:07 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

'Four-billion-year chill' on Mars
BBC | 7/21/05 | David Whitehouse
Posted on 07/21/2005 4:57:09 PM EDT by LibWhacker
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1447845/posts


36 posted on 05/14/2006 7:56:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson