Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarks_when_bored; All
What would you call the place where the marble-sized universe was located? What were its physical properties? Do we say that an infinitely large space containing nothing, a total vacuum, was then and has since been filled by a universe of objects ranging from galaxies to sub-atomic particles?

Would you want to stand next to the marble-sized universe, if you could be assured of escaping to a safe distance before detonation?

5 posted on 03/17/2006 3:54:01 AM PST by ExGeeEye (All Hail the Great Folger, creator of hot brown goodness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExGeeEye
Good questions. I think we're still trying to find the answers.

But as for your last question, there's no escaping the birth expansion of a cosmos! If you're anywhere nearby when it starts, you'll be gone in a trillionth of a second or less.

7 posted on 03/17/2006 3:57:44 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye

String theory would seem to suggest that our universe can be imagined as one of many, like bubbles in a froth, and as each expands (or contracts) it 'merely' inflates or conflates the froth. In that manner of envisioning the universe, there's nothing 'next' to the universe within our timespace; you cannot travel to the 'edge' of the universe because there is no edge, except as a purely abstract mental construct.


9 posted on 03/17/2006 4:01:32 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye
What would you call the place where the marble-sized universe was located?
Everywhere.

What were its physical properties?
Very dense.

Do we say that an infinitely large space containing nothing, a total vacuum, was then and has since been filled by a universe of objects ranging from galaxies to sub-atomic particles?
No. Space is what is expanding.

84 posted on 03/17/2006 11:13:57 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye
Do we say that an infinitely large space containing nothing, a total vacuum, was then and has since been filled

That is not in any of the major mathematical models. What is in the models is that the universe, when it was microscopic and now when it is too big to imagine very well, was complete in itself: no outside to expand into.

85 posted on 03/17/2006 11:21:14 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye
Would you want to stand next to the marble-sized universe, if you could be assured of escaping to a safe distance before detonation?

Stand WAY back, there, sonny boy!

The last thing heard before the Big Bang: "Hold muh beer and watch this!"

98 posted on 03/17/2006 5:02:55 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson