I was around FR during the impeachment, when we all hypnotoized each other that the country was livid at Clinton, wanted him sorry arse out of office, and that the polls (which showed support for Clinton) were all wrong.
The polls leading up to the 2000 election showed a close race, giving Bush a slight edge. On election day, Nader's support collapsed and made it closer than expected. The polls were right.
The polls leading up to the 2004 election showed a close race, givin Bush a few point edge. The polls were right.
I have no idea why Freepers insist that the pre-election polls were wrong. The exit polls on election day initially gave poor results, but they were refined as the day went on.
Polls are meaningful.
If Bush's polling numbers don't improve over the next few months, it could be a very difficult night for the GOP on election day. Leading up to it, Bush will be ridiculed by the libs in ad after ad, and the GOPers who will be running from Bush will be tied to him in all of these ads, usually in the most non-flattering way...
I used to get BLASTED by some FReepers for getting irate that Bush and Cheney/Frist/Hastert didn't fight back at these outrageous charges. As the old phrase goes... if a lie is repeated often enough, ESPECIALLY IF IT DOESN'T EVEN GET CHALLENGED, it will be believed as fact by many...
It was a disgraceful thing to all for years, and now we're seeing the fruits of the libs' lies.
Is there anyone out there that STILL thinks turning the other cheek at all times was the right move? Come on now.
"He who lives by the polls will die by the polls, ask the 1% of democrats with brains and they will tell you how true this is."